Cohort validation pack
CLOZUK
CLOZUK Clozapine Pharmacogenomics Study
Generated 6 Oct 2026, 10:36 · ID 58
Last verified: 16/04/2026
Instructions for reviewers
- Review each field against your knowledge of this cohort. Mark Accurate if the value is right, Needs correction if it is wrong or inaccurate (add notes), Not sure if you cannot verify it, or Does not apply if the field is not relevant.
- Evidence shown is from our source registry. Fields marked No source yet hold values we could not yet pin to a document — those were AI-inferred and need your input most. Fields marked Searched — not published are ones we looked for and could not find publicly; the note lists where we checked.
- Your selections and notes are kept in this browser tab only (not sent to the database). Print or save as PDF when finished, then return it to the DIGIT team.
Overview
72
Total fields
43
Field-cited
0
Whole-record source only
7
AI-inferred, no source yet
17
Searched — not published
23
No value held
25
Needs review
Source coverage
Summary of how well fields in this pack are linked to evidence.
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Field-level source coverage Optional | 43 of 67 reviewable fields are cited to a source (64%) · 7 with no source yet · 17 searched — not published · 23 with no value held | Computed | No citation linked to this field yet. | No response selected | No notes |
Identity and ownership
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Short name Required | CLOZUK | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Full name Required | CLOZUK Clozapine Pharmacogenomics Study | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Managing organisation Recommended | Cardiff University (MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics) | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Primary site Recommended | Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (site #11) | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Website URL Recommended | No value held | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URL Recommended | No value held | No source yet | No citation linked to this field yet. | No response selected | No notes |
Contact name Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Contact email Recommended | pardinasa@cardiff.ac.uk | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Summary and status
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description Required | UK resource of anonymised blood-derived DNA from people prescribed clozapine via the Zaponex Treatment Access System (ZTAS) clozapine monitoring programme, with genome-wide genotyping used in international schizophrenia GWAS and clozapine pharmacogenomics. Phenotype definition is treatment-resistant schizophrenia (clozapine-indicated) rather than unselected schizophrenia. | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Total N Required | 11,260 | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Total N qualifier Recommended | exact | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Year established Recommended | 2018 | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Active cohort Recommended | Yes | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Ongoing recruitment Recommended | Yes | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Refreshed cohort Recommended | Yes | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Recontact success rate Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Retention rate Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Published references Recommended | doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2, doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00002-0 | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Notes Recommended | group_label=group_4 reflects anonymised/no recontact access model with routine clinical monitoring-derived samples; data_availability=3 is driven by dense genotyping on those samples (borderline vs typical group_4 administrative-only datasets). Subset sizes differ by analysis wave (e.g. pharmacokinetic GWAS n≈4495 in Pardiñas et al. 2023 vs 11,260 schizophrenia cases in Pocklington et al. 2018 GWAS). year_established uses the landmark Nat Genet GWAS publication issue window (Mar 2018) as a verifiable public milestone; clinical monitoring waves began earlier (e.g. CLOZUK2) per full-text sources not captured in PubMed HTML snapshots. | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
3D cohort mapping
Consent, characterisation, and data availability axes used on the cohort map.
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consent level (axis) Required | 1 — Anonymised / no consent | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Characterisation depth (axis) Required | 1 — Routine EHR | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Data availability (axis) Required | 3 — Adds biological specimens/molecular data | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Cohort map group (derived) Recommended | Group 4 | Internal | Internal catalogue field | — | — |
Population type Recommended | Clinical | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Industry engagement status Recommended | Unknown | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Parent cohort / programme Recommended | No value held | No source yet | No citation linked to this field yet. | No response selected | No notes |
TWiCs eligible Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Data modalities
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Questionnaire / interview Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Cognitive testing Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Physical measures Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Biosamples Recommended | Yes | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Genomic data Recommended | Yes | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Omics Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Imaging Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Wearable / sensor Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Digital phenotyping Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Linked health records Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Biosample types Recommended | blood | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Genotyping platform Recommended | Illumina HumanOmniExpressExome / HumanCoreExome | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Imaging modalities Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Mental health measures Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Data subcategories
Structured modality and subcategory rows used alongside the high-level data-type flags.
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data subcategories Recommended List key data subcategories using distinct rows for category markers, named questionnaire/interview instruments, biospecimen types, omics/genomics data products, imaging modalities, sensor streams, and linked-record types. | No value held | No source yet | No citation linked to this field yet. | No response selected | No notes |
Consent and use permissions
Specific use permissions separate from the 3D consent-level axis.
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consent and use permissions Recommended Confirm health/biomedical research use, industry/commercial consideration, non-commercial restrictions, governance modifiers, recontact, trial approach, biosample use, linkage, sharing, international transfer, and any Section 251/CAG support. | No value held | No source yet | No citation linked to this field yet. | No response selected | No notes |
Access pathways
One or more routes by which researchers can request or analyse data.
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Access pathways Recommended Confirm all data access pathways, including route, access level, TRE/SDE or download/API environment, DAC review, collaboration requirements, data sharing agreements, output checking, timelines, and fees. | No value held | No source yet | No citation linked to this field yet. | No response selected | No notes |
Within-cohort coverage
Aggregate counts or percentages showing how broadly data, consent, or access characteristics apply within the cohort.
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Within-cohort coverage metrics Recommended Provide numerator, denominator, unit type, numerator/denominator exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, date/release, original source wording, and whether each metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total. | No value held | No source yet | No citation linked to this field yet. | No response selected | No notes |
Linkage and access
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHS linkage Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
GP linkage Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Death registry linkage Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Education linkage Recommended | No | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Data access mechanism Recommended | collaboration | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
TRE platform Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Data dictionary URL Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Data access timeline (days) Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Data access cost Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Participant profile and dates
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age distribution Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Sex distribution Recommended | male: 0.727; female: 0.273 | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Ethnicity distribution Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Smoking status distribution Recommended | No value held | No source yet | No citation linked to this field yet. | No response selected | No notes |
Median age Recommended | 42.2 | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Percent female Recommended | 27.30 | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Percent non-white Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Geographic coverage Recommended | national | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Follow-up duration Recommended | Longitudinal clozapine pharmacokinetic monitoring within UK ZTAS (multi-year assay series; multiple CLOZUK waves including CLOZUK2 and CLOZUK3 per Pardiñas et al. 2023) | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Last data collection date Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Recruitment start date Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Recruitment end date Recommended | No value held | Not published |
| No response selected | No notes |
Diagnosis areas
Mental health diagnosis areas represented in this cohort.
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis area: Treatment-resistant schizophrenia Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown. | Treatment-resistant schizophrenia · Psychotic Disorders · est. n=11,260 | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Linked sites
Sites contributing participants or data to this cohort.
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linked site: Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre Recommended | Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre · Wales | Field-cited |
| No response selected | No notes |
Verification metadata
Internal catalogue status — for reference only.
| Field | Current value | Evidence | Source evidence | Response | Notes / correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Verification status Recommended | unverified | Internal | Internal catalogue field | — | — |
Last verified Recommended | 16 Apr 2026 | Internal | Internal catalogue field | — | — |
Data source Recommended | Verified Apr 2026 from Pocklington et al. Nat Genet 2018 (DOI 10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2; PubMed 29483656 HTML snapshot), Pardiñas et al. Lancet Psychiatry 2023 (DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00002-0; PubMed 36804072 HTML snapshot), ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 query.term=CLOZUK (JSON snapshot), ISRCTN XML API q=CLOZUK (XML snapshot), HDR UK Innovation Gateway homepage snapshot (no dedicated CLOZUK dataset row isolated from quick browse context), DPUK portal homepage (dementia-focused catalogue; no CLOZUK listing), shared sources id=42 (Cardiff/CUBRIC anchor), id=3 (DPUK registry), id=1 (HDRUK gateway), id=11 (ClinicalTrials.gov), id=12 (ISRCTN). | Internal | Internal catalogue field | — | — |