Seed data — not verified. Approximate data from public sources, not yet confirmed by cohort leads or site reps.

Why?
All validation packs

Cohort validation pack

OpenSAFELY

OpenSAFELY

Generated 6 Oct 2026, 10:37 · ID 51

Unverified

Last verified: 16/04/2026

Instructions for reviewers

  • Review each field against your knowledge of this cohort. Mark Accurate if the value is right, Needs correction if it is wrong or inaccurate (add notes), Not sure if you cannot verify it, or Does not apply if the field is not relevant.
  • Evidence shown is from our source registry. Fields marked No source yet hold values we could not yet pin to a document — those were AI-inferred and need your input most. Fields marked Searched — not published are ones we looked for and could not find publicly; the note lists where we checked.
  • Your selections and notes are kept in this browser tab only (not sent to the database). Print or save as PDF when finished, then return it to the DIGIT team.

Overview

75

Total fields

41

Field-cited

0

Whole-record source only

8

AI-inferred, no source yet

21

Searched — not published

30

No value held

32

Needs review

Source coverage

Summary of how well fields in this pack are linked to evidence.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Field-level source coverage

Optional

41 of 70 reviewable fields are cited to a source (59%) · 8 with no source yet · 21 searched — not published · 30 with no value heldComputed

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Field-level source coverage

Identity and ownership

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Short name

Required

OpenSAFELYField-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in brief

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

    Section: title

    “OpenSAFELY in brief - OpenSAFELY”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

Response for Short name
Full name

Required

OpenSAFELYField-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in brief

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

    Section: title

    “OpenSAFELY in brief - OpenSAFELY”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

Response for Full name
Managing organisation

Recommended

University of Oxford / London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineField-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: OpenSAFELY is a public asset

    “OpenSAFELY is a public asset. It is publicly funded, built by researchers and software developers at the University of Oxford, all IP is shared openly, and the Data Controller is NHS England.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

Response for Managing organisation
Primary site

Recommended

No value heldField-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: Data Controller

    “NHS England is the Data Controller for the service as a whole.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

Response for Primary site
Website URL

Recommended

https://www.opensafely.org/Field-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in brief

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

    Section: Canonical site

    “https://www.opensafely.org/”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

Response for Website URL
Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URL

Recommended

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URL
Contact name

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: no single public cohort contact name mandated for the whole platform on reviewed pages.

Response for Contact name
Contact email

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: platform-wide public contact email not extracted from reviewed pages (site has contact routes).

Response for Contact email

Summary and status

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Description

Required

Secure, transparent software platform for analysis of NHS electronic health records. Research code runs against pseudonymised records inside vendor and NHS-hosted environments; aggregated outputs leave the secure perimeter. NHS England is the Data Controller for the service; development is led from the University of Oxford with LSHTM EHR science collaboration.Field-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “Working on behalf of NHS England, we created OpenSAFELY—a secure health analytics platform that covers 40% of all patients in England and holds patient data within the existing data centre of a major vendor of primary care electronic health records.”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in brief

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

    Section: OpenSAFELY is a software platform

    “OpenSAFELY is a software platform for analysing large, sensitive datasets – without compromising any of the secrets inside.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: OpenSAFELY is a secure, transparent, open-source software platform

    “Rather than allowing researchers to make copies of the raw data, OpenSAFELY leaves the data where it's already stored. Instead, OpenSAFELY takes the research code to the data – then brings back aggregated results in the form of tables and graphs.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

Response for Description
Total N

Required

No value heldField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “covers 40% of all patients in England”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Total N
Total N qualifier

Recommended

No value heldField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “covers 40% of all patients in England”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Total N qualifier
Year established

Recommended

2020Field-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: dc.source

    “Nature 2020 584:7821”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Year established
Active cohort

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: Platform News / Optum access

    “as of January 2026, research access to data held by Optum data is temporarily closed, pending agreed funding arrangements between Optum and NHS England.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

Response for Active cohort
Ongoing recruitment

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: OpenSAFELY is used in various different ways

    “OpenSAFELY is used in various different ways, but the most important way is with data from the NHS – particularly GP records.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

Response for Ongoing recruitment
Refreshed cohort

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: OpenSAFELY in brief (body)

    “Taken together, health records from millions of people are combined in huge datasets.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

Response for Refreshed cohort

Recontact success rate

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: not applicable to non-recruited EHR platform.

Response for Recontact success rate

Retention rate

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: not applicable to non-recruited EHR platform.

Response for Retention rate

Published references

Recommended

doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071261Field-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: citation_doi

    “10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

  • ClinicalTrials.gov

    https://clinicaltrials.gov

    Section: referencesModule.references[0].citation

    “Herrett E, Tomlin K, Lin LY, Tomlinson LA, Jit M, Briggs A, Marks M, Sandmann F, Parry J, Bates C, Morley J, Bacon S, Butler-Cole B, Mahalingasivam V, Dennison A, Smith D, Gabriel E, Mehrkar A, Goldacre B, Smeeth L, Eggo RMM. Protocol for an OpenSAFELY cohort study collecting patient-reported outcome measures using the TPP Airmid smartphone application and linked big data to quantify the health and economic costs of long COVID (OpenPROMPT). BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e071261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071261.”

    Page: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05552612

Response for Published references
Notes

Recommended

Primary care coverage spans TPP SystmOne and Optum (formerly EMIS) deployments in England; OpenSAFELY in detail notes a January 2026 pause on research access to Optum-held data pending funding arrangements with NHS England. Mental health phenotypes are typically derived from coded diagnoses and prescribing in routine records rather than research-only assessments.Field-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: Optum access

    “as of January 2026, research access to data held by Optum data is temporarily closed, pending agreed funding arrangements between Optum and NHS England.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

Response for Notes

3D cohort mapping

Consent, characterisation, and data availability axes used on the cohort map.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Consent level (axis)

Required

2 — Section 251 / CAG (pseudonymised, no individual consent)Field-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “Primary care records of 17,278,392 adults were pseudonymously linked to 10,926 COVID-19-related deaths.”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: Data Provision Notice

    “Data Provision Notice to GP practices explaining the legal obligation they are under to share patient data to OpenSAFELY.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

Response for Consent level (axis)
Characterisation depth (axis)

Required

1 — Routine EHRField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Characterisation depth (axis)
Data availability (axis)

Required

1 — Clinical records onlyField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Data availability (axis)
Cohort map group (derived)

Recommended

Group 4Internal

Internal catalogue field

——
Population type

Recommended

Data resourceNot published
  • DIGIT Cohort Portfolio Review — population type and engagement classification (Aug 2026)

Response for Population type
Industry engagement status

Recommended

UnknownNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: industry engagement status is an organisational property of the custodian and is not publicly documented; default 'unknown' pending a cohort-owner meeting.

Response for Industry engagement status
Parent cohort / programme

Recommended

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Parent cohort / programme
TWiCs eligible

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research

    “Gaining appropriate research ethics approval is a prerequisite for using the OpenSAFELY platform.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

Response for TWiCs eligible

Data modalities

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Questionnaire / interview

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Questionnaire / interview
Cognitive testing

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Cognitive testing
Physical measures

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Physical measures
Biosamples

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Biosamples
Genomic data

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Genomic data
Omics

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Omics
Imaging

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Imaging
Wearable / sensor

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Wearable / sensor
Digital phenotyping

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Digital phenotyping
Linked health records

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • DIGIT — docs/data-dictionary.md (in-repo snapshot)

    https://raw.githubusercontent.com/avantgarda/digit-capabilities-db/main/docs/data-dictionary.md

    Section: Cohort Data Type Flags

    “Use the specific linkage sub-fields (`has_nhs_linkage`, `has_gp_linkage`, etc.) to record details.”

    Page: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/avantgarda/digit-capabilities-db/main/docs/data-dictionary.md

  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: particularly GP records

    “OpenSAFELY is used in various different ways, but the most important way is with data from the NHS – particularly GP records.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

Response for Linked health records
Biosample types

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE / FALSE implied: no biosample bank for the platform core.

Response for Biosample types
Genotyping platform

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: no genotyping platform for the platform core.

Response for Genotyping platform
Imaging modalities

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: no imaging archive for the platform core.

Response for Imaging modalities
Mental health measures

Recommended

GP-recorded mental disorder diagnoses (Read v2 / CTV3 / SNOMED CT codelists), Primary care prescribing (e.g. BNF-classified antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics)Field-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: What using the service actually looks like

    “to extract and shape data from the available data sets.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

Response for Mental health measures

Data subcategories

Structured modality and subcategory rows used alongside the high-level data-type flags.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Data subcategories

Recommended

List key data subcategories using distinct rows for category markers, named questionnaire/interview instruments, biospecimen types, omics/genomics data products, imaging modalities, sensor streams, and linked-record types.

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Data subcategories

Consent and use permissions

Specific use permissions separate from the 3D consent-level axis.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Consent and use permissions

Recommended

Confirm health/biomedical research use, industry/commercial consideration, non-commercial restrictions, governance modifiers, recontact, trial approach, biosample use, linkage, sharing, international transfer, and any Section 251/CAG support.

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Consent and use permissions

Access pathways

One or more routes by which researchers can request or analyse data.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Access pathways

Recommended

Confirm all data access pathways, including route, access level, TRE/SDE or download/API environment, DAC review, collaboration requirements, data sharing agreements, output checking, timelines, and fees.

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Access pathways

Within-cohort coverage

Aggregate counts or percentages showing how broadly data, consent, or access characteristics apply within the cohort.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Within-cohort coverage metrics

Recommended

Provide numerator, denominator, unit type, numerator/denominator exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, date/release, original source wording, and whether each metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Within-cohort coverage metrics

Linkage and access

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
NHS linkage

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • OpenSAFELY documentation — Data sources overview

    https://docs.opensafely.org/data-sources/

    Section: Data sources overview (toc)

    “Hospital admissions (hospital spells, outpatients and A&E)”

    Page: https://docs.opensafely.org/data-sources/

Response for NHS linkage
GP linkage

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for GP linkage
Death registry linkage

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “Primary care records of 17,278,392 adults were pseudonymously linked to 10,926 COVID-19-related deaths.”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Death registry linkage
Education linkage

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Education linkage
Data access mechanism

Recommended

treField-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: OpenSAFELY in brief (body)

    “Researchers only get to see insights. They never get unconstrained access to the raw data.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-brief/

Response for Data access mechanism
TRE platform

Recommended

OpenSAFELY (vendor/NHS-hosted secure execution environments)Field-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: deployed within the secure data centres

    “The software is deployed within the secure data centres of the two largest electronic health record providers in the NHS: TPP and Optum (formerly Emis).”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

Response for TRE platform
Data dictionary URL

Recommended

https://docs.opensafely.org/Field-cited
  • OpenSAFELY — OpenSAFELY in detail

    https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

    Section: Documentation

    “All our documentation is published in the open.”

    Page: https://www.opensafely.org/os-in-detail/

Response for Data dictionary URL
Data access timeline (days)

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: NHS England project approval timelines not quantified as days on reviewed pages.

Response for Data access timeline (days)
Data access cost

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: no public fee schedule on reviewed pages.

Response for Data access cost

Participant profile and dates

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Age distribution

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE in this pass: no Table 1-style age JSON extracted into downloaded files for the platform entity.

Response for Age distribution
Sex distribution

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE in this pass: sex distribution JSON not transcribed from full-text tables.

Response for Sex distribution
Ethnicity distribution

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE in this pass: ethnicity JSON not transcribed (Nature HTML abstract mentions ethnicity but not structured JSON).

Response for Ethnicity distribution
Smoking status distribution

Recommended

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Smoking status distribution
Median age

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: no median age field extracted for the platform row.

Response for Median age
Percent female

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: no percent female extracted for the platform row.

Response for Percent female
Percent non-white

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: no percent non-white extracted for the platform row.

Response for Percent non-white
Geographic coverage

Recommended

nationalField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: application/ld+json description

    “covers 40% of all patients in England”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Geographic coverage
Follow-up duration

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: platform has no single follow-up window.

Response for Follow-up duration
Last data collection date

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: rolling EHR feeds do not present one last_data_collection_date for the platform entity.

Response for Last data collection date
Recruitment start date

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: not a recruited cohort.

Response for Recruitment start date
Recruitment end date

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: not a recruited cohort.

Response for Recruitment end date

Diagnosis areas

Mental health diagnosis areas represented in this cohort.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Diagnosis area: Schizophrenia

Recommended

Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.

Schizophrenia · Psychotic DisordersField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: dc.description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Diagnosis area: Schizophrenia
Diagnosis area: Major depressive disorder

Recommended

Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.

Major depressive disorder · Mood DisordersField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: dc.description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Diagnosis area: Major depressive disorder
Diagnosis area: Generalised anxiety disorder

Recommended

Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.

Generalised anxiety disorder · Anxiety DisordersField-cited
  • Williamson et al. — Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY (Nature, 2020)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

    Section: dc.description

    “primary care electronic health records”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

Response for Diagnosis area: Generalised anxiety disorder
Diagnosis area: Long COVID neuropsychiatric

Recommended

Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.

Long COVID neuropsychiatric · OtherField-cited
  • ClinicalTrials.gov

    https://clinicaltrials.gov

    Section: conditions

    “Long COVID”

    Page: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05552612

Response for Diagnosis area: Long COVID neuropsychiatric

Linked sites

Sites contributing participants or data to this cohort.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Linked sites

Optional

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Linked sites

Verification metadata

Internal catalogue status — for reference only.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Verification status

Recommended

unverifiedInternal

Internal catalogue field

——
Last verified

Recommended

16 Apr 2026Internal

Internal catalogue field

——
Data source

Recommended

Verified Apr 2026 from OpenSAFELY in brief, OpenSAFELY in detail, OpenSAFELY documentation (data sources overview), Williamson et al. Nature 2020 (DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4), ClinicalTrials.gov API (OpenSAFELY query), ISRCTN API (OpenSAFELY query), Herrett et al. BMJ Open 2023 protocol (OpenPROMPT; 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071261), DIGIT data-dictionary.md and data-population-plan.md. HDR UK Gateway API returned HTTP 500; DPUK cohort directory URL fetch returned 404 — both logged in entity_sources.Internal

Internal catalogue field

——