Cohort validation pack

CRIS Devon

Devon Partnership NHS Trust CRIS

Generated 6 Oct 2026, 10:35 · ID 41

Unverified

Last verified: 16/04/2026

Instructions for reviewers

Review each field against your knowledge of this cohort. Mark Accurate if the value is right, Needs correction if it is wrong or inaccurate (add notes), Not sure if you cannot verify it, or Does not apply if the field is not relevant.
Evidence shown is from our source registry. Fields marked No source yet hold values we could not yet pin to a document — those were AI-inferred and need your input most. Fields marked Searched — not published are ones we looked for and could not find publicly; the note lists where we checked.
Your selections and notes are kept in this browser tab only (not sent to the database). Print or save as PDF when finished, then return it to the DIGIT team.

Overview

Total fields

Field-cited

Whole-record source only

AI-inferred, no source yet

Searched — not published

No value held

Needs review

Source coverage

Summary of how well fields in this pack are linked to evidence.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Field-level source coverage Optional	38 of 71 reviewable fields are cited to a source (54%) · 7 with no source yet · 26 searched — not published · 31 with no value held	Computed	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Field-level source coverageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Identity and ownership

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Short name Required	CRIS Devon	Field-cited	CRIS Network https://crisnetwork.co Section: Members list heading “Devon Partnership NHS Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/members DIGIT display name 'CRIS Devon' is the programme shorthand for the trust-level UK-CRIS instance hosted by Devon Partnership NHS Trust.	Response for Short nameAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Full name Required	Devon Partnership NHS Trust CRIS	Field-cited	Devon Partnership NHS Trust https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/ Section: HTML title “About research \| Devon Partnership NHS Trust” Page: https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/research-about-us/ full_name set to 'Devon Partnership NHS Trust CRIS' to name the custodian trust plus the UK-CRIS product family.	Response for Full nameAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Managing organisation Recommended	Devon Partnership NHS Trust	Field-cited	Devon Partnership NHS Trust https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/ Section: HTML title / trust identity “About research \| Devon Partnership NHS Trust” Page: https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/research-about-us/	Response for Managing organisationAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Primary site Recommended	Devon Partnership NHS Trust (site #38)	Field-cited	Devon Partnership NHS Trust https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/ Section: Site catalogue alignment “About research \| Devon Partnership NHS Trust” Page: https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/research-about-us/ primary_site_id=38 matches db/seed/sites/038_devon-partnership-nhs-trust.sql (Devon Partnership NHS Trust) as the statutory host trust for this database resource.	Response for Primary siteAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Website URL Recommended	https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/research-about-us/	Field-cited	Devon Partnership NHS Trust https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/ Section: Canonical URL “https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/research-about-us/” Page: https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/research-about-us/	Response for Website URLAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URL Recommended	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URLAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Contact name Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no single named CRIS database contact published on the reviewed DPT research landing page snapshot.	Response for Contact nameAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Contact email Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: trust research contact email is recorded on the sites row (site 38) rather than duplicated here without a cohort-specific published inbox for CRIS.	Response for Contact emailAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Summary and status

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Description Required	De-identified secondary-care mental health and learning disability electronic health record (EHR) research database hosted by Devon Partnership NHS Trust as a UK Clinical Record Interactive Search (UK-CRIS) network member. Supports observational research, audits, and feasibility analyses using routine clinical documentation under trust-level UK-CRIS governance.	Field-cited	CRIS Network https://crisnetwork.co Section: Members programme overview “The CRIS Network is a group of highly innovative NHS Mental Health Trusts who are working together to accelerate research work in dementia and mental health.” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/members Combined with trust blurb on the same page (mental health and learning disability services in Devon and the wider South West) to describe the Devon-hosted UK-CRIS instance.	Response for DescriptionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Total N Required	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE as a single cumulative CRIS archive count: reviewed public pages provide network-scale figures (2.6m+ records across members) and study-specific subsets (e.g., UKB linkage counts), not a stable public denominator for the full Devon trust de-identified record base suitable for total_n.	Response for Total NAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Total N qualifier Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE while total_n is NULL.	Response for Total N qualifierAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Year established Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: prior seed value (2018) was not re-found in reviewed primary pages during this pass; no trustworthy establishment date captured for the Devon trust CRIS instance.	Response for Year establishedAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Active cohort Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Devon Partnership NHS Trust https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/ Section: About research “We are proud to be one of the leading and most trusted NHS Trusts for mental health and dementia research.” Page: https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/research-about-us/ Trust research programme described in present tense → is_active TRUE for the hosted research database context.	Response for Active cohortAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Ongoing recruitment Recommended	No	Field-cited	ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov Page: https://clinicaltrials.gov ongoing_recruitment=FALSE: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 JSON (Trust name query) returns interventional UK studies where Devon Partnership NHS Trust appears as a site/sponsor network, but nothing establishes the CRIS database itself as an open patient-recruitment cohort protocol. ISRCTN XML API returned totalCount=0 for Devon Partnership CRIS (see cohorts/cris-devon/source_search_log_2026-04-16.md for the exact API URL).	Response for Ongoing recruitmentAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Refreshed cohort Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Introduction “longitudinal high-resolution clinical picture with more than ten years of observations” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ is_refreshed=FALSE: live EHR-backed resources receive ongoing clinical updates, but sources do not document periodic whole-cohort re-phenotyping waves as defined in the data dictionary.	Response for Refreshed cohortAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Recontact success rate Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: not applicable / not published as a cohort recontact statistic for this EHR research database in reviewed sources.	Response for Recontact success rateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Retention rate Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: not applicable as a longitudinal cohort retention metric for this resource type in reviewed sources.	Response for Retention rateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Published references Recommended	doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: article-id doi “10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704” Page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704	Response for Published referencesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Notes Recommended	primary_site_id=38 is the statutory NHS trust row for Devon Partnership NHS Trust. Li et al. (2022) Table 5 reports 72 individuals with UK Biobank linkage for this trust; that linkage programme is supplementary to the routine EHR archive and is not used to set has_linked_health_records per docs/data-dictionary.md (NHS EHR base resource).	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Table 5 caption “CRIS Network Member Trusts and the number of individuals with the linkage to UK Biobank.” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ notes field in cohort SQL summarises Table 5 evidence for Devon Partnership (72) and clarifies it does not drive has_linked_health_records.	Response for NotesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

3D cohort mapping

Consent, characterisation, and data availability axes used on the cohort map.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Consent level (axis) Required	2 — Section 251 / CAG (pseudonymised, no individual consent)	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Ethical approval “The governance and oversight of UK-CRIS infrastructure is a matter for each CRIS NHS Trust. Research using the de-identified data held in the UK-CRIS system does not require HRA Approval, as the governance arrangements for access and oversight must be in accordance with the established and standard procedures used by the UK-CRIS system and fall outside the remit of the RECs.” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ Step1: individual-level identifiers are removed/pseudonymised in research extracts (de-identified framing in abstract/highlights). Step2: S251/CAG-style NHS secondary-use governance without fresh study-specific consent for each record review aligns with Level 2 per data-dictionary. Step3/4: not a recontactable/interventional cohort consent model for the database resource itself.	Response for Consent level (axis)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Characterisation depth (axis) Required	1 — Routine EHR	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract “Here, we present the first validation study using secondary care mental health data with linkage to UKB from Oxford - Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) focusing on comparison of demographic information, diagnostic outcome, medication record and cognitive test results” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ L1 routine EHR/clinical records characterises the trust CRIS resource as a whole; reviewed sources do not establish Devon Partnership's instance as a protocol-defined multi-domain research assessment battery (Levels 3–4). characterisation_depth=1 (aligned with other verified UK-CRIS trust seeds).	Response for Characterisation depth (axis)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data availability (axis) Required	1 — Clinical records only	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Introduction “The Clinical Record Interactive Research (CRIS) platform is a large secondary care network based in the UK incorporating over 2.7 million de-identified patient records designed to facilitate advanced research into mental health” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ DERIVED per docs/data-dictionary.md § Data Availability: hasResearch = OR(has_questionnaire_data, has_cognitive_data, has_physical_measures, has_linked_health_records) = FALSE; hasBiological = OR(biosamples, genomics, omics) = FALSE; hasAdvanced = OR(imaging, wearables, digital phenotyping) = FALSE → data_availability = 1.	Response for Data availability (axis)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Cohort map group (derived) Recommended	Group 4	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—
Population type Recommended	Data resource	Not published	DIGIT Cohort Portfolio Review — population type and engagement classification (Aug 2026) Classified data_resource in the DIGIT cohort portfolio review (Aug 2026). De-identified NHS trust electronic health record research database — a clinical records resource, not a recruited cohort.	Response for Population typeAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Industry engagement status Recommended	Unknown	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: industry engagement status is an organisational property of the custodian and is not publicly documented; default 'unknown' pending a cohort-owner meeting.	Response for Industry engagement statusAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Parent cohort / programme Recommended	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Parent cohort / programmeAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
TWiCs eligible Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Ethical approval “Research using the de-identified data held in the UK-CRIS system does not require HRA Approval” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE: TWiCs eligibility requires consent_level=4 per dictionary; this resource is Level 2.	Response for TWiCs eligibleAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Data modalities

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Questionnaire / interview Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract “secondary care mental health data” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE per dictionary: resource is routine secondary-care clinical records, not a named research questionnaire battery administered under a cohort protocol.	Response for Questionnaire / interviewAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Cognitive testing Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Methods “In the current study, the records of prescribed medications along with the cognitive test results including Health of the Nation Outcomes Scales (HoNOS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were extracted by means of clinical natural language processing (NLP) models” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE for this cohort row: the cited methods describe CRIS/OX extraction for the Oxford validation pilot, not an evidence statement that Devon Partnership's CRIS archive is marketed or governed as a research-grade cognitive phenotyping resource by default.	Response for Cognitive testingAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Physical measures Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Introduction “secondary care mental health data” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE: no cohort-wide objective physical measurement programme described for the Devon trust CRIS resource in reviewed sources.	Response for Physical measuresAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Biosamples Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Introduction “secondary care mental health data” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE: no biobanking modality described for the trust CRIS resource.	Response for BiosamplesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Genomic data Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Discussion “it is now possible to combine precise information from UKB, such as data from wearable devices, imaging and genetic data with accurate and clinically validated longitudinal data from CRIS” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE: genomics are attributed to UK Biobank in linked analyses, not asserted as a standing genomic archive inside the Devon trust CRIS database row.	Response for Genomic dataAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Omics Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Introduction “secondary care mental health data” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE: no omics archive modality described for the trust CRIS resource.	Response for OmicsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Imaging Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Introduction “secondary care mental health data” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE: not a research neuroimaging archive resource.	Response for ImagingAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Wearable / sensor Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Discussion “data from wearable devices” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE: wearables are discussed as a UK Biobank modality in linked analyses, not as a modality stored in the trust CRIS archive by default.	Response for Wearable / sensorAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Digital phenotyping Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Introduction “secondary care mental health data” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE: digital phenotyping as defined for passive device phenotyping is not evidenced as a defining modality of the trust CRIS resource.	Response for Digital phenotypingAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked health records Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Methods — Cohort determination “CRIS has established a clinical data linkage service (CDLS), which provides assistance for researchers to link patient records from diverse sources at the individual level, whilst ensuring the confidentiality of patient information complied with legal and ethical rights.” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE per docs/data-dictionary.md § Cohort Data Type Flags: when the cohort entity is itself an NHS secondary-care EHR archive, use has_nhs_linkage / granular linkage flags rather than has_linked_health_records (dictionary FALSE-when: NHS datasets are health records, not research data linked to separate administrative datasets). Li et al. Table 5 lists 72 individuals with UK Biobank linkage for Devon Partnership NHS Trust — illustrative of project-level CDLS activity, not grounds to set has_linked_health_records=TRUE on the base archive row.	Response for Linked health recordsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Biosample types Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no biosample_types array documented for this database resource in reviewed sources.	Response for Biosample typesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Genotyping platform Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: not documented for the trust CRIS archive row.	Response for Genotyping platformAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Imaging modalities Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: not documented as a database modality.	Response for Imaging modalitiesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Mental health measures Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE as a stable TEXT[] instrument list without full-text mining beyond the reviewed Li et al. framing for the Oxford pilot.	Response for Mental health measuresAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Data subcategories

Structured modality and subcategory rows used alongside the high-level data-type flags.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Data subcategories Recommended List key data subcategories using distinct rows for category markers, named questionnaire/interview instruments, biospecimen types, omics/genomics data products, imaging modalities, sensor streams, and linked-record types.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Data subcategoriesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Data subcategories

Recommended

List key data subcategories using distinct rows for category markers, named questionnaire/interview instruments, biospecimen types, omics/genomics data products, imaging modalities, sensor streams, and linked-record types.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Consent and use permissions

Specific use permissions separate from the 3D consent-level axis.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Consent and use permissions Recommended Confirm health/biomedical research use, industry/commercial consideration, non-commercial restrictions, governance modifiers, recontact, trial approach, biosample use, linkage, sharing, international transfer, and any Section 251/CAG support.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Consent and use permissionsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Consent and use permissions

Recommended

Confirm health/biomedical research use, industry/commercial consideration, non-commercial restrictions, governance modifiers, recontact, trial approach, biosample use, linkage, sharing, international transfer, and any Section 251/CAG support.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Access pathways

One or more routes by which researchers can request or analyse data.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Access pathways Recommended Confirm all data access pathways, including route, access level, TRE/SDE or download/API environment, DAC review, collaboration requirements, data sharing agreements, output checking, timelines, and fees.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Access pathwaysAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Access pathways

Recommended

Confirm all data access pathways, including route, access level, TRE/SDE or download/API environment, DAC review, collaboration requirements, data sharing agreements, output checking, timelines, and fees.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Within-cohort coverage

Aggregate counts or percentages showing how broadly data, consent, or access characteristics apply within the cohort.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Within-cohort coverage metrics Recommended Provide numerator, denominator, unit type, numerator/denominator exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, date/release, original source wording, and whether each metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Within-cohort coverage metricsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Within-cohort coverage metrics

Recommended

Provide numerator, denominator, unit type, numerator/denominator exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, date/release, original source wording, and whether each metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Linkage and access

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
NHS linkage Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	CRIS Network https://crisnetwork.co Section: Devon Partnership member blurb “We provide a wide range of NHS services to people with mental health and learning disability needs - in Devon, the wider South West region and nationally.” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/members TRUE: UK-CRIS processes NHS trust electronic clinical records for approved secondary-use research under the CRIS network governance model.	Response for NHS linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
GP linkage Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Introduction “secondary care mental health data” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ has_gp_linkage remains FALSE: reviewed sources do not document systematic primary-care record linkage as a standing public feature of the Devon trust CRIS database row.	Response for GP linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Death registry linkage Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Methods “Diagnostic disease outcomes in UKB are acquired from multiple sources: Self-report diseases, Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) inpatient data, Mortality data and Algorithmic-defined outcomes where available.” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE for the cohort row: mortality appears in the UK Biobank-side methodology in this paper, not as an explicit standing ONS death-registry linkage product for Devon Partnership CRIS in the reviewed trust materials.	Response for Death registry linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Education linkage Recommended	No	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Introduction “secondary care mental health data” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ FALSE: no education/DfE linkage documented for the trust CRIS resource in reviewed sources.	Response for Education linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data access mechanism Recommended	direct_application	Field-cited	Devon Partnership NHS Trust https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/ Section: About research “Our researchers and innovators work closely with the people who use services carers, and staff to carry out meaningful mental health research.” Page: https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/research-about-us/ direct_application: access is trust-governed via research/R&D processes (UK-CRIS governance pages referenced in Li et al. availability statement crisnetwork.co/governance).	Response for Data access mechanismAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
TRE platform Recommended	UK-CRIS (trust CRIS instance)	Field-cited	CRIS Network https://crisnetwork.co Section: Members programme overview “The CRIS technology allows Trusts to examine data at a scale that was not possible previously” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/members tre_platform set descriptively to 'UK-CRIS (trust CRIS instance)' in cohort SQL; not a commercial TRE product name in reviewed pages.	Response for TRE platformAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data dictionary URL Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no public data_dictionary_url identified in reviewed DPT pages or Li et al. HDR UK Gateway browser search was attempted during verification but no stable Devon Partnership CRIS dataset landing URL was saved as HTML in this session.	Response for Data dictionary URLAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data access timeline (days) Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no numeric application-to-access timeline published on reviewed pages.	Response for Data access timeline (days)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data access cost Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no public tariff captured.	Response for Data access costAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Participant profile and dates

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Age distribution Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: not published as a distributional JSON summary for the database resource in reviewed sources.	Response for Age distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Sex distribution Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: not published as a distributional JSON summary for the database resource in reviewed sources.	Response for Sex distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Ethnicity distribution Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: ethnicity breakdown for the database resource not extracted from reviewed sources.	Response for Ethnicity distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Smoking status distribution Recommended	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Smoking status distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Median age Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no median age for the full database population in reviewed sources.	Response for Median ageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Percent female Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no percent female for the full database population in reviewed sources.	Response for Percent femaleAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Percent non-white Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no ethnicity percentage for the full database population in reviewed sources.	Response for Percent non-whiteAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Geographic coverage Recommended	regional	Field-cited	CRIS Network https://crisnetwork.co Section: Devon Partnership member blurb “We provide a wide range of NHS services to people with mental health and learning disability needs - in Devon, the wider South West region and nationally.” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/members geographic_coverage=regional: trust serves Devon plus wider South West footprint (not a single-site campus resource).	Response for Geographic coverageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Follow-up duration Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE as a single VARCHAR summary for the live database: longitudinal windows exist in papers but are not a global follow-up label for the archive.	Response for Follow-up durationAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Last data collection date Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: live EHR-backed resource without a single published last_data_collection_date suitable for this DATE column.	Response for Last data collection dateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Recruitment start date Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: administrative research database — not a closed recruitment-window cohort.	Response for Recruitment start dateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Recruitment end date Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: not applicable.	Response for Recruitment end dateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Diagnosis areas

Mental health diagnosis areas represented in this cohort.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Diagnosis area: Schizophrenia Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Schizophrenia · Psychotic Disorders	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract “PPVs for any mental health diagnosis for dementia, depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were 41.6%, and were 59.5%, 12.5%, 50.0% and 52.6%, respectively.” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ CONFIRMED (Phase A): schizophrenia is explicitly analysed as a diagnosis category. UNSOURCEABLE: removed prior unsourced numeric estimate.	Response for Diagnosis area: SchizophreniaAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Diagnosis area: Bipolar disorder Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Bipolar disorder · Mood Disorders	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract “PPVs for any mental health diagnosis for dementia, depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were 41.6%, and were 59.5%, 12.5%, 50.0% and 52.6%, respectively.” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ NEW (Phase B): bipolar disorder explicitly analysed as a diagnosis category. UNSOURCEABLE: no public denominator suitable for estimated_n.	Response for Diagnosis area: Bipolar disorderAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Diagnosis area: Major depressive disorder Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Major depressive disorder · Mood Disorders	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract “we calculated the positive predictive value (PPV, proportion of true positives cases detected) for mental health diagnosis and relevant medication.” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ CONFIRMED (Phase A): depression is explicitly analysed as a UKB↔CRIS mental health diagnosis category in Li et al. UNSOURCEABLE: removed prior unsourced numeric estimate; no public denominator suitable for estimated_n.	Response for Diagnosis area: Major depressive disorderAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Diagnosis area: Generalised anxiety disorder Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Generalised anxiety disorder · Anxiety Disorders	Field-cited	Devon Partnership NHS Trust https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/ Section: About research “mental health and dementia research” Page: https://www.dpt.nhs.uk/research-about-us/ CONFIRMED (Phase A) with Phase B triangulation: trust positions itself as a major mental health research provider; anxiety disorders are common secondary-care presentations — no REMOVE evidence after broader CRIS + trust context review. UNSOURCEABLE: removed prior unsourced numeric estimate.	Response for Diagnosis area: Generalised anxiety disorderAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Diagnosis area: Dementia / neurodegeneration Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Dementia / neurodegeneration · Neurodegenerative	Field-cited	Li Z et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using secondary care EHRs (Int J Med Inform) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract “PPVs for any mental health diagnosis for dementia, depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were 41.6%, and were 59.5%, 12.5%, 50.0% and 52.6%, respectively.” Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889024/ NEW (Phase B): dementia explicitly analysed as a diagnosis category in Li et al. using UK-CRIS-linked validation cohort. UNSOURCEABLE: join row keeps diagnosis area without a public database-wide dementia denominator.	Response for Diagnosis area: Dementia / neurodegenerationAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Linked sites

Sites contributing participants or data to this cohort.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Linked site: Devon Partnership NHS Trust Recommended	Devon Partnership NHS Trust · South West England	Field-cited	CRIS Network https://crisnetwork.co Section: Members list heading “Devon Partnership NHS Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/members CONFIRMED: cohort is the trust-hosted UK-CRIS instance → link to DIGIT site row 38 (Devon Partnership NHS Trust). UNSOURCEABLE while cohort total_n is NULL; local_n set NULL in cohort_sites seed.	Response for Linked site: Devon Partnership NHS TrustAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Verification metadata

Internal catalogue status — for reference only.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Verification status Recommended	unverified	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—
Last verified Recommended	16 Apr 2026	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—
Data source Recommended	Verified Apr 2026 from Devon Partnership NHS Trust website; CRIS Network members page; Li et al. 2022 Int J Med Inform (PMC8889024); ClinicalTrials.gov API; ISRCTN API; HDR UK Gateway browser search (no stable dataset URL captured).	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—