Cohort validation pack

CRIS Network

CRIS Network (Federated)

Generated 6 Oct 2026, 10:35 · ID 32

AI inferred

Instructions for reviewers

Review each field against your knowledge of this cohort. Mark Accurate if the value is right, Needs correction if it is wrong or inaccurate (add notes), Not sure if you cannot verify it, or Does not apply if the field is not relevant.
Evidence shown is from our source registry. Fields marked No source yet hold values we could not yet pin to a document — those were AI-inferred and need your input most. Fields marked Searched — not published are ones we looked for and could not find publicly; the note lists where we checked.
Your selections and notes are kept in this browser tab only (not sent to the database). Print or save as PDF when finished, then return it to the DIGIT team.

Overview

Total fields

Field-cited

Whole-record source only

AI-inferred, no source yet

Searched — not published

No value held

Needs review

Source coverage

Summary of how well fields in this pack are linked to evidence.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Field-level source coverage Optional	49 of 81 reviewable fields are cited to a source (60%) · 7 with no source yet · 25 searched — not published · 30 with no value held	Computed	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Field-level source coverageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Identity and ownership

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Short name Required	CRIS Network	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: HTML title “CRIS Network” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/	Response for Short nameAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Full name Required	CRIS Network (Federated)	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Banner “Welcome to the CRIS Network” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ full_name set to CRIS Network (Federated) to reflect UK-CRIS federated programme described on crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme.	Response for Full nameAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Managing organisation Recommended	University of Oxford / MRC / NIHR	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Programme body “Led by Oxford University, UK-CRIS is the third in a series of programmes” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Also names MRC and NIHR as funders in the same paragraph; combined into managing_organisation string.	Response for Managing organisationAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Primary site Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE for a single primary_site_id: UK-CRIS is explicitly multi-trust; no one trust is named as sole lead site in the downloaded pages beyond Oxford University leadership text.	Response for Primary siteAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Website URL Recommended	https://crisnetwork.co/	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Canonical “https://crisnetwork.co/” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/	Response for Website URLAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URL Recommended	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URLAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Contact name Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE on accessed pages as a single named cohort contact field beyond generic site contact.	Response for Contact nameAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Contact email Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: crisnetwork.co contact is form-based; no stable public contact_email for the umbrella resource extracted here.	Response for Contact emailAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Summary and status

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Description Required	UK federated Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) platform: twelve participating NHS mental health trusts, each hosting de-identified electronic mental health records locally, with federated querying so analyses can run without patient-level records leaving the trust. Public-facing materials cite 2.6m+ de-identified electronic patient records collectively and dementia and mental health as the main research focus.	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Programme body “UK-CRIS will also see the introduction of ‘federated querying’ – the ability for researchers to query the de-identified data of other participating organisations as well as their own, creating a dramatically richer cohort for research.” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Combined with members-page stats (12 trusts; 2.6m+ records) in separate rows.	Response for DescriptionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Total N Required	2,600,000	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Members statistics “2.6m+” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ Mapped to integer 2600000; qualifier set to approximate.	Response for Total NAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Total N qualifier Recommended	approximate	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Members statistics “2.6m+” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ Qualifier approximate because headline is a lower-bound-style rounded aggregate across trusts.	Response for Total N qualifierAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Year established Recommended	2008	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Programme body “It builds on the foundations of both the original , in South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme 2008 retained as CRIS lineage start year consistent with SLaM CRIS origin literature referenced indirectly; exact federated programme launch year not stated on these pages.	Response for Year establishedAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Active cohort Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “The CRIS Network is developing a research platform across the country” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ Present tense programme → is_active TRUE.	Response for Active cohortAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Ongoing recruitment Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Programme body “develop the clinical record into a data asset and research tool for NHS Mental Health Trusts” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Resource is administrative/EHR infrastructure rather than a single actively recruiting study cohort → ongoing_recruitment FALSE.	Response for Ongoing recruitmentAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Refreshed cohort Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Members statistics “De-identified electronic patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ Rolling administrative records are not the same as a refreshed research cohort per data-dictionary definition → FALSE.	Response for Refreshed cohortAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Recontact success rate Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: not applicable as a single federated aggregate metric on accessed pages.	Response for Recontact success rateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Retention rate Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: administrative record platform without cohort retention statistic published on accessed pages.	Response for Retention rateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Published references Recommended	doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704	Field-cited	Lia et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using UK-CRIS (International Journal of Medical Informatics) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Highlights (publisher page; full text not downloaded here) “Linking UK Clinical Record Interactive Search (UK-CRIS) and UKBiobank” Page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Peer-reviewed paper explicitly frames UK-CRIS as twelve NHS mental health trusts network linked to UK Biobank validation work.	Response for Published referencesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Notes Recommended	Member trusts (public list on crisnetwork.co, April 2026): AWP, Devon Partnership, KMPT, Mersey Care, NELFT, Nottinghamshire Healthcare, Northumberland Tyne and Wear, Oxford Health, Southern Health, SWLStG, West London Mental Health, BSMHFT. SLaM originated CRIS but is not listed among the twelve federated members on that page. cohort_sites uses existing DIGIT site rows where a trust has no dedicated sites row (NIHR Nottingham BRC for Nottinghamshire Healthcare; NIHR Newcastle BRC as regional anchor for NTW). Southern Health NHS FT and West London Mental Health NHS Trust are not yet in sites — see verification reconciliation.	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Ordered member trust names (list items) “Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ notes field summarises all twelve member trusts and mapping caveats; member names confirmed from ordered list in downloaded / page HTML. CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/	Response for NotesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

3D cohort mapping

Consent, characterisation, and data availability axes used on the cohort map.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Consent level (axis) Required	2 — Section 251 / CAG (pseudonymised, no individual consent)	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Governance body “If for example an NHS Trust wants to speak to patients with schizophrenia who are female and between the ages of 25-45 they can use CRIS to search the anonymous database and find out how many people they have who fit this criteria. If these people have given their consent to be contacted about relevant research projects, a special process can be carried out to allow the researchers to get in contact with these (and only these) individuals.” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/governance Step 1 identifiable within governance pathways for approved projects: YES for custodians but not open public identifiers. Step 2 default network use is de-identified/secondary-care record research without asserting individual recontact for all records → Section 251/CAG-style NHS secondary use (consent_level 2). Step 3 optional recontact exists only where separate consent obtained → not the default for the data resource as a whole. Step 4 no blanket interventional consent → not level 4.	Response for Consent level (axis)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Characterisation depth (axis) Required	2 — Standardised MH instruments	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “Through robust governance and cutting edge technology, the Clinical Record Interactive Search system (CRIS) allows research and service improvement work to take place that has previously not been possible.” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ Decision tree: routine MH EHR is baseline (level 1). CRIS implementations across these trusts incorporate structured clinical documentation and routinely collected outcome/severity metrics used in UK secondary mental health care beyond bare ICD codes → conservative level 2 (not research-grade SCID cohort).	Response for Characterisation depth (axis)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data availability (axis) Required	1 — Clinical records only	Not published	DERIVED per data-dictionary.md: hasResearch = (questionnaire OR cognitive OR physical OR linked_health_records) = FALSE; hasBiological = FALSE; hasAdvanced = FALSE → data_availability = 1.	Response for Data availability (axis)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Cohort map group (derived) Recommended	Group 4	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—
Population type Recommended	Data resource	Not published	DIGIT Cohort Portfolio Review — population type and engagement classification (Aug 2026) Classified data_resource in the DIGIT cohort portfolio review (Aug 2026). Federated network of de-identified trust EHR research databases — a clinical records resource, not a recruited cohort.	Response for Population typeAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Industry engagement status Recommended	Unknown	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: industry engagement status is an organisational property of the custodian and is not publicly documented; default 'unknown' pending a cohort-owner meeting.	Response for Industry engagement statusAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Parent cohort / programme Recommended	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Parent cohort / programmeAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
TWiCs eligible Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Governance body “search the anonymous database” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/governance TWiCs requires consent_level 4 per data-dictionary; this resource scored at 2 → twics_eligible FALSE.	Response for TWiCs eligibleAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Data modalities

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Questionnaire / interview Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “deidentified patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ FALSE per data-dictionary: no evidence the federated archive is defined by named research questionnaires administered as a cohort protocol (as distinct from clinical records).	Response for Questionnaire / interviewAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Cognitive testing Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “deidentified patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ FALSE: no evidence of research-grade cognitive test battery archive for the federated resource as described on these pages.	Response for Cognitive testingAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Physical measures Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “deidentified patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ FALSE: no evidence of research physical measurement programme for the federated resource as described.	Response for Physical measuresAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Biosamples Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “deidentified patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ FALSE: biosample banking not described as part of the federated CRIS Network offering.	Response for BiosamplesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Genomic data Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “deidentified patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ FALSE: genomics not described as part of the federated CRIS Network offering.	Response for Genomic dataAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Omics Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “deidentified patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ FALSE: omics not described as part of the federated CRIS Network offering.	Response for OmicsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Imaging Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “deidentified patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ FALSE: imaging archive not described as part of the federated CRIS Network offering.	Response for ImagingAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Wearable / sensor Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “deidentified patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ FALSE: wearable device data programme not described.	Response for Wearable / sensorAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Digital phenotyping Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “deidentified patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ FALSE: passive digital phenotyping programme not described.	Response for Digital phenotypingAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked health records Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “deidentified patient records” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ FALSE per data-dictionary overlap rule: this resource is itself NHS mental health electronic records, not a separate research cohort with external linkage flags.	Response for Linked health recordsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Biosample types Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: NULL array; no biosample catalogue for umbrella resource.	Response for Biosample typesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Genotyping platform Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: NULL.	Response for Genotyping platformAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Imaging modalities Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: NULL array.	Response for Imaging modalitiesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Mental health measures Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: NULL array; trust-specific measure sets not enumerated on umbrella pages.	Response for Mental health measuresAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Data subcategories

Structured modality and subcategory rows used alongside the high-level data-type flags.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Data subcategories Recommended List key data subcategories using distinct rows for category markers, named questionnaire/interview instruments, biospecimen types, omics/genomics data products, imaging modalities, sensor streams, and linked-record types.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Data subcategoriesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Data subcategories

Recommended

List key data subcategories using distinct rows for category markers, named questionnaire/interview instruments, biospecimen types, omics/genomics data products, imaging modalities, sensor streams, and linked-record types.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Consent and use permissions

Specific use permissions separate from the 3D consent-level axis.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Consent and use permissions Recommended Confirm health/biomedical research use, industry/commercial consideration, non-commercial restrictions, governance modifiers, recontact, trial approach, biosample use, linkage, sharing, international transfer, and any Section 251/CAG support.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Consent and use permissionsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Consent and use permissions

Recommended

Confirm health/biomedical research use, industry/commercial consideration, non-commercial restrictions, governance modifiers, recontact, trial approach, biosample use, linkage, sharing, international transfer, and any Section 251/CAG support.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Access pathways

One or more routes by which researchers can request or analyse data.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Access pathways Recommended Confirm all data access pathways, including route, access level, TRE/SDE or download/API environment, DAC review, collaboration requirements, data sharing agreements, output checking, timelines, and fees.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Access pathwaysAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Access pathways

Recommended

Confirm all data access pathways, including route, access level, TRE/SDE or download/API environment, DAC review, collaboration requirements, data sharing agreements, output checking, timelines, and fees.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Within-cohort coverage

Aggregate counts or percentages showing how broadly data, consent, or access characteristics apply within the cohort.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Within-cohort coverage metrics Recommended Provide numerator, denominator, unit type, numerator/denominator exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, date/release, original source wording, and whether each metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Within-cohort coverage metricsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Within-cohort coverage metrics

Recommended

Provide numerator, denominator, unit type, numerator/denominator exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, date/release, original source wording, and whether each metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Linkage and access

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
NHS linkage Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Programme body “develop the clinical record into a data asset and research tool for NHS Mental Health Trusts” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Set FALSE: has_nhs_linkage in data-dictionary is HES-style linkage metadata; not evidenced as a uniform cross-trust linked extract here.	Response for NHS linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
GP linkage Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Programme body “develop the clinical record into a data asset and research tool for NHS Mental Health Trusts” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme FALSE: no programme statement that federated resource uniformly includes GP-primary-care linkage.	Response for GP linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Death registry linkage Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Programme body “develop the clinical record into a data asset and research tool for NHS Mental Health Trusts” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme FALSE: death-registry linkage not stated as a guaranteed federated capability on accessed pages.	Response for Death registry linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Education linkage Recommended	No	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Programme body “develop the clinical record into a data asset and research tool for NHS Mental Health Trusts” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme No education-record linkage described for the umbrella resource → FALSE.	Response for Education linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data access mechanism Recommended	other	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Programme body “the ability for researchers to query the de-identified data of other participating organisations as well as their own, creating a dramatically richer cohort for research.” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Matches data-dictionary data_access_mechanism=other (federated analysis; data remain at source trusts).	Response for Data access mechanismAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
TRE platform Recommended	UK-CRIS Federated Platform	Field-cited	CRIS Network — UK-CRIS Programme https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Section: Programme body “federated querying” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/uk-cris-programme Label UK-CRIS Federated Platform to match programme description; not a commercial TRE product name on page.	Response for TRE platformAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data dictionary URL Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no single data_dictionary_url for umbrella on accessed pages.	Response for Data dictionary URLAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data access timeline (days) Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no standard timeline published on accessed pages.	Response for Data access timeline (days)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data access cost Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no standard cost published on accessed pages.	Response for Data access costAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Participant profile and dates

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Age distribution Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: crisnetwork.co pages accessed do not publish a cohort Table 1 age distribution for the federated resource.	Response for Age distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Sex distribution Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no sex split published on crisnetwork.co for the federated aggregate.	Response for Sex distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Ethnicity distribution Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no ethnicity breakdown published on crisnetwork.co for the federated aggregate.	Response for Ethnicity distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Smoking status distribution Recommended	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Smoking status distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Median age Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no median age for the federated umbrella on accessed pages.	Response for Median ageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Percent female Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no percent female for the federated umbrella on accessed pages.	Response for Percent femaleAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Percent non-white Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no ethnicity distribution for the federated umbrella on accessed pages.	Response for Percent non-whiteAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Geographic coverage Recommended	national	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Members statistics “NHS Mental Health Trusts across the UK” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ Multi-trust coverage across English regions → geographic_coverage national (UK-wide programme).	Response for Geographic coverageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Follow-up duration Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: not defined as a single cohort follow-up window for the umbrella.	Response for Follow-up durationAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Last data collection date Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: rolling EHR; no single collection date on accessed pages.	Response for Last data collection dateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Recruitment start date Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE.	Response for Recruitment start dateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Recruitment end date Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE.	Response for Recruitment end dateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Diagnosis areas

Mental health diagnosis areas represented in this cohort.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Diagnosis area: Schizophrenia Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Schizophrenia · Psychotic Disorders	Field-cited	Lia et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using UK-CRIS (International Journal of Medical Informatics) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract (publisher page) “schizophrenia” Page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 estimated_n NULL; schizophrenia explicitly named in UK-CRIS validation abstract as example condition. CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/	Response for Diagnosis area: SchizophreniaAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Diagnosis area: Bipolar disorder Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Bipolar disorder · Mood Disorders	Field-cited	Lia et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using UK-CRIS (International Journal of Medical Informatics) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract (publisher page) “bipolar disorder” Page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 estimated_n NULL; bipolar explicitly named in UK-CRIS validation abstract. CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/	Response for Diagnosis area: Bipolar disorderAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Diagnosis area: Major depressive disorder Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Major depressive disorder · Mood Disorders	Field-cited	Lia et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using UK-CRIS (International Journal of Medical Informatics) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract (publisher page) “depression” Page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 estimated_n NULL: public programme pages give aggregate record counts only, not diagnosis-specific denominators for the federated umbrella. CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/	Response for Diagnosis area: Major depressive disorderAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Diagnosis area: Generalised anxiety disorder Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Generalised anxiety disorder · Anxiety Disorders	Field-cited	Lia et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using UK-CRIS (International Journal of Medical Informatics) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract (publisher page) “mental health” Page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 estimated_n NULL for umbrella resource; anxiety disorders inferred as routinely present in secondary MH EHR research populations. CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/	Response for Diagnosis area: Generalised anxiety disorderAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Diagnosis area: Substance use disorders Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Substance use disorders · Substance Use	Field-cited	Lia et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using UK-CRIS (International Journal of Medical Informatics) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract (publisher page) “mental health” Page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Substance use disorders coded within secondary mental health care records; estimated_n NULL (no public per-diagnosis counts for umbrella). CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/	Response for Diagnosis area: Substance use disordersAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Diagnosis area: Personality disorders (BPD) Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	Personality disorders (BPD) · Personality Disorders	Field-cited	Lia et al. 2022 — Validation of UK Biobank mental health outcomes using UK-CRIS (International Journal of Medical Informatics) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Section: Abstract (publisher page) “mental health” Page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704 Personality disorder-related care appears in MH EHR systems; estimated_n NULL. CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Intro “advance research into dementia and mental health” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/	Response for Diagnosis area: Personality disorders (BPD)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Linked sites

Sites contributing participants or data to this cohort.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Linked site: NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre Recommended	NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre · East Midlands	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Member list “Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ Site row 10 (Nottingham BRC) used as anchor; BRC site description references Nottinghamshire Healthcare for MH/CRIS. UNSOURCEABLE: no public per-trust patient counts for the umbrella federated cohort row in sources consulted.	Response for Linked site: NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked site: South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust Recommended	South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust · London	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Member list “South West London and St George's NHS Foundation Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ UNSOURCEABLE: no public per-trust patient counts for the umbrella federated cohort row in sources consulted.	Response for Linked site: South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS TrustAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked site: North East London NHS Foundation Trust Recommended	North East London NHS Foundation Trust · London	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Member list “North East London Foundation Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ Listed on site as NELFT; maps to North East London NHS Foundation Trust site row 42. UNSOURCEABLE: no public per-trust patient counts for the umbrella federated cohort row in sources consulted.	Response for Linked site: North East London NHS Foundation TrustAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked site: NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre Recommended	NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre · North East England	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Member list “Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ Site row 9 (Newcastle BRC) used as regional research anchor where NTW trust lacks a dedicated sites row; Newcastle BRC description references NTW MH/CRIS linkage. UNSOURCEABLE: no public per-trust patient counts for the umbrella federated cohort row in sources consulted.	Response for Linked site: NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research CentreAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked site: Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust Recommended	Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust · North West England	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Member list “Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ UNSOURCEABLE: no public per-trust patient counts for the umbrella federated cohort row in sources consulted.	Response for Linked site: Mersey Care NHS Foundation TrustAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked site: NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre Recommended	NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre · South East England	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Member list “Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ Site row 2 (Oxford Health BRC) used as DIGIT anchor for Oxford Health NHS FT. UNSOURCEABLE: no public per-trust patient counts for the umbrella federated cohort row in sources consulted.	Response for Linked site: NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research CentreAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked site: Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust Recommended	Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust · South East England	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Member list “Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ UNSOURCEABLE: no public per-trust patient counts for the umbrella federated cohort row in sources consulted.	Response for Linked site: Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS TrustAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked site: Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Recommended	Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust · South West England	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Member list “Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ UNSOURCEABLE: no public per-trust patient counts for the umbrella federated cohort row in sources consulted.	Response for Linked site: Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked site: Devon Partnership NHS Trust Recommended	Devon Partnership NHS Trust · South West England	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Member list “Devon Partnership NHS Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ UNSOURCEABLE: no public per-trust patient counts for the umbrella federated cohort row in sources consulted.	Response for Linked site: Devon Partnership NHS TrustAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked site: Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust Recommended	Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · West Midlands	Field-cited	CRIS Network — Official Website https://crisnetwork.co/ Section: Member list “Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust” Page: https://crisnetwork.co/ UNSOURCEABLE: no public per-trust patient counts for the umbrella federated cohort row in sources consulted.	Response for Linked site: Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Verification metadata

Internal catalogue status — for reference only.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Verification status Recommended	ai_inferred	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—
Last verified Recommended	No value held	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—
Data source Recommended	crisnetwork.co (home, uk-cris-programme, governance); Lia et al. 2022 doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704; HDRUK Innovation Gateway browse; ClinicalTrials.gov umbrella check; Google Scholar cohort-profile search	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—