Seed data — not verified. Approximate data from public sources, not yet confirmed by cohort leads or site reps.

Why?
All validation packs

Cohort validation pack

RADAR-MDD

Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive Disorder

Generated 6 Oct 2026, 10:37 · ID 20

Unverified

Instructions for reviewers

  • Review each field against your knowledge of this cohort. Mark Accurate if the value is right, Needs correction if it is wrong or inaccurate (add notes), Not sure if you cannot verify it, or Does not apply if the field is not relevant.
  • Evidence shown is from our source registry. Fields marked No source yet hold values we could not yet pin to a document — those were AI-inferred and need your input most. Fields marked Searched — not published are ones we looked for and could not find publicly; the note lists where we checked.
  • Your selections and notes are kept in this browser tab only (not sent to the database). Print or save as PDF when finished, then return it to the DIGIT team.

Overview

72

Total fields

47

Field-cited

0

Whole-record source only

7

AI-inferred, no source yet

13

Searched — not published

20

No value held

20

Needs review

Source coverage

Summary of how well fields in this pack are linked to evidence.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Field-level source coverage

Optional

47 of 67 reviewable fields are cited to a source (70%) · 7 with no source yet · 13 searched — not published · 20 with no value heldComputed

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Field-level source coverage

Identity and ownership

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Short name

Required

RADAR-MDDField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Title

    “Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive Disorder (RADAR-MDD): recruitment, retention, and data availability in a longitudinal remote measurement study”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Short name
Full name

Required

Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive DisorderField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Title

    “Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive Disorder”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Full name
Managing organisation

Recommended

King's College LondonField-cited
Response for Managing organisation
Primary site

Recommended

NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (site #1)Field-cited
  • Atlas of Longitudinal Datasets — RADAR-MDD

    https://atlaslongitudinaldatasets.ac.uk/datasets/radar-mdd

    Section: Primary Institutions

    “King's College London (KCL) (Academic, United Kingdom)”

    Page: https://atlaslongitudinaldatasets.ac.uk/datasets/radar-mdd

Response for Primary site
Website URL

Recommended

https://atlaslongitudinaldatasets.ac.uk/datasets/radar-mddField-cited
  • Atlas of Longitudinal Datasets — RADAR-MDD

    https://atlaslongitudinaldatasets.ac.uk/datasets/radar-mdd

    Section: Dataset page header

    “Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive Disorder (RADAR-MDD)”

    Page: https://atlaslongitudinaldatasets.ac.uk/datasets/radar-mdd

Response for Website URL
Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URL

Recommended

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URL
Contact name

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: Public pages consulted (Atlas, BMC papers, HRA summary, RADAR-base case page) do not publish a specific current cohort contact name field for RADAR-MDD.

Response for Contact name
Contact email

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: No public dedicated RADAR-MDD contact email found in sources searched; HRA page omits a contact email value.

Response for Contact email

Summary and status

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Description

Required

Multi-centre longitudinal cohort study in recurrent major depressive disorder using smartphone sensing, wearable devices, and repeated questionnaire/cognitive assessments to track symptoms and relapse risk.Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Methods

    “RADAR-MDD is a multi-centre, prospective observational cohort study ... People with a history of MDD were provided with a wrist-worn wearable device, and smartphone apps designed to: a) collect data from smartphone sensors; and b) deliver questionnaires, speech tasks, and cognitive assessments.”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Description
Total N

Required

623Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Results

    “Individuals with a history of MDD (n = 623) were enrolled in the study”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Total N
Total N qualifier

Recommended

as_of_2022Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Publication date context

    “Published: 21 February 2022”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Total N qualifier
Year established

Recommended

2017Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Remote data collection

    “Data collection started in London (UK) in November 2017”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Year established
Active cohort

Recommended

NoField-cited
Response for Active cohort
Ongoing recruitment

Recommended

NoField-cited
Response for Ongoing recruitment
Refreshed cohort

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Remote data collection / follow-up

    “Participants were followed-up for a minimum of 11 months and maximum of 24 months.”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Refreshed cohort

Recontact success rate

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: No explicit recontact response-rate statistic reported in protocol/outcomes paper, Atlas, HRA, or RADAR-base case study.

Response for Recontact success rate

Retention rate

Recommended

79.80Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Results

    “A total of 497 people (79.8%) participated for the maximum possible duration”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Retention rate

Published references

Recommended

doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2049-z, doi:10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1, doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00749-3Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD baseline characteristics table (npj Digital Medicine)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00749-3

    Section: Table page / article linkage

    “Back to article page”

    Page: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00749-3/tables/1

Response for Published references
Notes

Recommended

Part of the RADAR-CNS programme. RADAR-MDD recruited across London, Amsterdam, and Barcelona and followed participants for up to 24 months using active and passive remote measurement technologies.Field-cited
Response for Notes

3D cohort mapping

Consent, characterisation, and data availability axes used on the cohort map.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Consent level (axis)

Required

2 — Section 251 / CAG (pseudonymised, no individual consent)Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Study population / consent

    “All participants provided written consent”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Consent level (axis)
Characterisation depth (axis)

Required

3 — Multi-domain MH characterisationField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Methods

    “The aRMT app administered validated measurements ... PHQ8 ... speech task ... ESM ... Cognitive function was measured every 6-weeks via an additional THINC-it app”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Characterisation depth (axis)
Data availability (axis)

Required

2 — Records + research dataField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Methods / Data collection

    “smartphone sensors ... questionnaires, speech tasks, and cognitive assessments ... wearable device”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Data availability (axis)
Cohort map group (derived)

Recommended

Group 3Internal

Internal catalogue field

——
Population type

Recommended

ClinicalNot published
  • DIGIT Cohort Portfolio Review — population type and engagement classification (Aug 2026)

Response for Population type
Industry engagement status

Recommended

UnknownNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: industry engagement status is an organisational property of the custodian and is not publicly documented; default 'unknown' pending a cohort-owner meeting.

Response for Industry engagement status
Parent cohort / programme

Recommended

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Parent cohort / programme
TWiCs eligible

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD protocol paper (BMC Psychiatry, 2019)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2049-z

    Section: Study design

    “The study involves no randomisation or intervention”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-019-2049-z

Response for TWiCs eligible

Data modalities

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Questionnaire / interview

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Active RMT

    “administered validated measurements ... PHQ8 ... RSES”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Questionnaire / interview
Cognitive testing

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Cognitive function

    “Cognitive function was measured every 6-weeks via an additional THINC-it app”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Cognitive testing
Physical measures

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Methods

    “wrist-worn wearable device ... smartphone sensors”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Physical measures
Biosamples

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Atlas of Longitudinal Datasets — RADAR-MDD

    https://atlaslongitudinaldatasets.ac.uk/datasets/radar-mdd

    Section: Data types collected

    “Linked or secondary data - None”

    Page: https://atlaslongitudinaldatasets.ac.uk/datasets/radar-mdd

Response for Biosamples
Genomic data

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Atlas of Longitudinal Datasets — RADAR-MDD

    https://atlaslongitudinaldatasets.ac.uk/datasets/radar-mdd

    Section: Data types collected

    “Data types collected ... Wearable devices ... questionnaires/interviews; Linked or secondary data - None”

    Page: https://atlaslongitudinaldatasets.ac.uk/datasets/radar-mdd

Response for Genomic data
Omics

Recommended

NoField-cited
Response for Omics
Imaging

Recommended

NoField-cited
Response for Imaging
Wearable / sensor

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Methods

    “People with a history of MDD were provided with a wrist-worn wearable device”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Wearable / sensor
Digital phenotyping

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Passive RMT

    “collected data on ambient noise, ambient light, location, app usage, Bluetooth connectivity, phone usage, and battery life”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Digital phenotyping
Linked health records

Recommended

NoField-cited
Response for Linked health records
Biosample types

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE/NOT APPLICABLE: No biosample collection reported; field left NULL with has_biosamples=FALSE.

Response for Biosample types
Genotyping platform

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE/NOT APPLICABLE: No genomic data reported; field left NULL with has_genomic_data=FALSE.

Response for Genotyping platform
Imaging modalities

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE/NOT APPLICABLE: No neuroimaging data collection reported; field left NULL with has_imaging_data=FALSE.

Response for Imaging modalities
Mental health measures

Recommended

PHQ-8, IDS-SR, CIDI-SF, GAD-7, RSESField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Methods

    “PHQ8 ... IDS-SR ... CIDI-SF ... GAD7 ... RSES”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Mental health measures

Data subcategories

Structured modality and subcategory rows used alongside the high-level data-type flags.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Data subcategories

Recommended

List key data subcategories using distinct rows for category markers, named questionnaire/interview instruments, biospecimen types, omics/genomics data products, imaging modalities, sensor streams, and linked-record types.

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Data subcategories

Consent and use permissions

Specific use permissions separate from the 3D consent-level axis.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Consent and use permissions

Recommended

Confirm health/biomedical research use, industry/commercial consideration, non-commercial restrictions, governance modifiers, recontact, trial approach, biosample use, linkage, sharing, international transfer, and any Section 251/CAG support.

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Consent and use permissions

Access pathways

One or more routes by which researchers can request or analyse data.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Access pathways

Recommended

Confirm all data access pathways, including route, access level, TRE/SDE or download/API environment, DAC review, collaboration requirements, data sharing agreements, output checking, timelines, and fees.

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Access pathways

Within-cohort coverage

Aggregate counts or percentages showing how broadly data, consent, or access characteristics apply within the cohort.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Within-cohort coverage metrics

Recommended

Provide numerator, denominator, unit type, numerator/denominator exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, date/release, original source wording, and whether each metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Within-cohort coverage metrics

Linkage and access

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
NHS linkage

Recommended

NoField-cited
Response for NHS linkage
GP linkage

Recommended

NoField-cited
Response for GP linkage
Death registry linkage

Recommended

NoField-cited
Response for Death registry linkage
Education linkage

Recommended

NoField-cited
Response for Education linkage
Data access mechanism

Recommended

collaborationField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Availability of data and materials

    “The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Data access mechanism
TRE platform

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: No TRE/SDE platform specified for RADAR-MDD access in public sources.

Response for TRE platform
Data dictionary URL

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: No public RADAR-MDD variable dictionary URL found in BMC papers, Atlas, HRA, RADAR-base case page, HDRUK search, DPUK portal, ClinicalTrials query, or ISRCTN query (registry page unavailable via repeated fetch attempts).

Response for Data dictionary URL
Data access timeline (days)

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: No processing timeline (days) for access requests found in public sources.

Response for Data access timeline (days)
Data access cost

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: No public access-cost information found for RADAR-MDD data access.

Response for Data access cost

Participant profile and dates

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Age distribution

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: No published age-band proportion table (e.g., 18-30/31-45/etc.) found in protocol paper, 2022 outcomes paper text, Atlas page, HRA summary, or registry pages. Only summary median age is available.

Response for Age distribution
Sex distribution

Recommended

male: 0.243; female: 0.757Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD baseline characteristics table (npj Digital Medicine)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00749-3

    Section: Table 1

    “Female, n (%) 465 (75.7)”

    Page: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00749-3/tables/1

Response for Sex distribution
Ethnicity distribution

Recommended

asian: 0.034; black: 0.03; other: 0.073; white: 0.863Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD baseline characteristics table (npj Digital Medicine)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00749-3

    Section: Table 1

    “White 404 (86.3) ... Black 14 (3.0) ... Asian 16 (3.4) ... Other 34 (7.3)”

    Page: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00749-3/tables/1

Response for Ethnicity distribution
Smoking status distribution

Recommended

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Smoking status distribution
Median age

Recommended

49.0Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD baseline characteristics table (npj Digital Medicine)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00749-3

    Section: Table 1

    “Age (median [IQR]) 49.00 [32.00, 58.75]”

    Page: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00749-3/tables/1

Response for Median age
Percent female

Recommended

75.70Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD baseline characteristics table (npj Digital Medicine)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00749-3

    Section: Table 1

    “Female, n (%) 465 (75.7)”

    Page: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00749-3/tables/1

Response for Percent female
Percent non-white

Recommended

13.70Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD baseline characteristics table (npj Digital Medicine)

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00749-3

    Section: Table 1

    “White 404 (86.3)”

    Page: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00749-3/tables/1

Response for Percent non-white
Geographic coverage

Recommended

multi_siteField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Study design

    “The study has three recruitment sites: King's College London (KCL, UK), Amsterdam University Medical Centre ... and ... CIBER (Barcelona, Spain).”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Geographic coverage
Follow-up duration

Recommended

11-24 monthsField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Recruitment and retention rates

    “the minimum and maximum lengths of possible follow-up were 11 months and 24 months respectively”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Follow-up duration
Last data collection date

Recommended

1 May 2021Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Data collection with RMT

    “data collection continuing until the last participant was unenrolled from the study on 1st May 2021”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Last data collection date
Recruitment start date

Recommended

30 Nov 2017Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Recruitment and retention rates

    “The first person was enrolled in RADAR-MDD on 30th November 2017”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Recruitment start date
Recruitment end date

Recommended

3 Jun 2020Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Recruitment and retention rates

    “recruitment ended on 3rd June 2020”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Recruitment end date

Diagnosis areas

Mental health diagnosis areas represented in this cohort.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Diagnosis area: Major depressive disorder

Recommended

Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.

Major depressive disorder · Mood Disorders · est. n=623Field-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Results

    “Individuals with a history of MDD (n = 623) were enrolled in the study”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Study population

    “individuals must ... have met DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for non-psychotic MDD”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Diagnosis area: Major depressive disorder

Linked sites

Sites contributing participants or data to this cohort.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Linked site: NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre

Recommended

NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre · LondonField-cited
  • RADAR-MDD recruitment, retention, and data availability (BMC Psychiatry, 2022)

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

    Section: Study design

    “The study has three recruitment sites: King's College London (KCL, UK), Amsterdam University Medical Centre ... and ... CIBER (Barcelona, Spain).”

    Page: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1

Response for Linked site: NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre

Verification metadata

Internal catalogue status — for reference only.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Verification status

Recommended

unverifiedInternal

Internal catalogue field

——
Last verified

Recommended

No value heldInternal

Internal catalogue field

——
Data source

Recommended

No value heldInternal

Internal catalogue field

——