Cohort validation pack

Early Psychosis

Early Intervention Mission Study

Generated 6 Oct 2026, 10:35 · ID 2

Unverified

Instructions for reviewers

Review each field against your knowledge of this cohort. Mark Accurate if the value is right, Needs correction if it is wrong or inaccurate (add notes), Not sure if you cannot verify it, or Does not apply if the field is not relevant.
Evidence shown is from our source registry. Fields marked No source yet hold values we could not yet pin to a document — those were AI-inferred and need your input most. Fields marked Searched — not published are ones we looked for and could not find publicly; the note lists where we checked.
Your selections and notes are kept in this browser tab only (not sent to the database). Print or save as PDF when finished, then return it to the DIGIT team.

Overview

Total fields

Field-cited

Whole-record source only

AI-inferred, no source yet

Searched — not published

No value held

Needs review

Source coverage

Summary of how well fields in this pack are linked to evidence.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Field-level source coverage Optional	29 of 67 reviewable fields are cited to a source (43%) · 9 with no source yet · 29 searched — not published · 31 with no value held	Computed	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Field-level source coverageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Identity and ownership

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Short name Required	Early Psychosis	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — Home https://eim.digitrial.com/ Section: Page header “The Early Intervention Mission Study” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/	Response for Short nameAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Full name Required	Early Intervention Mission Study	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — Home https://eim.digitrial.com/ Section: Page header “The Early Intervention Mission Study” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/	Response for Full nameAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Managing organisation Recommended	NIHR Mental Health Translational Research Collaboration (MH-TRC) Mission	Field-cited	NIHR Oxford Health BRC — Early Psychosis workstream https://oxfordhealthbrc.nihr.ac.uk/mh-trc/early-psychosis/ Section: Research focus “The Early Psychosis workstream is a nationally coordinated initiative within the Mental Health Translational Research Collaboration (MH-TRC) Mission” Page: https://oxfordhealthbrc.nihr.ac.uk/mh-trc/early-psychosis/	Response for Managing organisationAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Primary site Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE for single primary site: cohort is UK-wide across multiple regions and NHS trusts; no single lead site declared as sole primary recruitment site.	Response for Primary siteAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Website URL Recommended	https://eim.digitrial.com/	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — Home https://eim.digitrial.com/ Section: Canonical URL “The Early Intervention Mission Study” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/	Response for Website URLAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URL Recommended	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URLAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Contact name Recommended	Professor Graham Murray	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Chief Investigator “Professor Graham Murray, MD PhD FRCPsych” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about	Response for Contact nameAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Contact email Recommended	eim@psychiatry.cam.ac.uk	Field-cited	NIHR Oxford Health BRC — Early Psychosis workstream https://oxfordhealthbrc.nihr.ac.uk/mh-trc/early-psychosis/ Section: Impact “For more information on the Early Psychosis workstream email: eim@psychiatry.cam.ac.uk” Page: https://oxfordhealthbrc.nihr.ac.uk/mh-trc/early-psychosis/	Response for Contact emailAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Summary and status

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Description Required	UK-wide longitudinal early psychosis cohort and registry designed to support translational research and future interventional studies via targeted recall.	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Aim of the study “Our purpose is to develop a UK wide longitudinal representative study to progress our understanding of early identification, treatment and prevention of emerging psychosis patients.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about	Response for DescriptionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Total N Required	2,500	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — For Researchers https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers Section: Background “The study is building a rich dataset from 2,000 individuals with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) or At-Risk Mental State (ARMS), alongside 500 control participants.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers 2,000 cases + 500 controls -> target total_n=2500.	Response for Total NAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Total N qualifier Recommended	target	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — For Researchers https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers Section: Background “The study is building a rich dataset from 2,000 individuals with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) or At-Risk Mental State (ARMS), alongside 500 control participants.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers Counts are stated as planned build, so qualifier is target.	Response for Total N qualifierAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Year established Recommended	2023	Field-cited	NIHR Oxford Health BRC — MH-TRC overview https://oxfordhealthbrc.nihr.ac.uk/mh-trc/ Section: What is the Mental Health Translational Research Collaboration Mission? “the MH-TRC Mission funded for 2023-2028” Page: https://oxfordhealthbrc.nihr.ac.uk/mh-trc/ Earliest explicit mission period begins in 2023; used as cohort establishment year for this mission cohort.	Response for Year establishedAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Active cohort Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — For Researchers https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers Section: Invitation to new sites “We are actively inviting new sites to join this important research.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers	Response for Active cohortAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Ongoing recruitment Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — For Researchers https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers Section: Invitation to new sites “We are actively inviting new sites to join this important research.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers	Response for Ongoing recruitmentAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Refreshed cohort Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Study design “Longitudinal Cohort Study of people with, or at risk of, early psychosis.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about Longitudinal follow-up with repeated data collection indicates ongoing refreshment.	Response for Refreshed cohortAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Recontact success rate Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no public quantitative recontact success metric reported.	Response for Recontact success rateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Retention rate Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no public retention percentage reported.	Response for Retention rateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Published references Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no definitive cohort profile DOI for the EIM cohort identified from public sources at verification time.	Response for Published referencesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Notes Recommended	Target population is 2,000 people with FEP/ARMS plus 500 controls.	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for NotesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

3D cohort mapping

Consent, characterisation, and data availability axes used on the cohort map.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Consent level (axis) Required	3 — Broad consent (recontactable for future studies)	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Aim of the study “They will be aged between 16 and 65 inclusive and be able to give informed consent via REDCap.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about Step 1 identifiable=YES (consented participants). Step 2 S251/CAG=NO (explicit participant consent). Step 3 recontactable=YES (research register for future studies). Step 4 specific interventional consent=NO (future studies require separate enrolment). -> consent_level=3.	Response for Consent level (axis)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Characterisation depth (axis) Required	3 — Multi-domain MH characterisation	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Clinical outcome measures “medical and psychological including cognitive assessments, measured longitudinally via electronic means and/or by a researcher” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about Step 1 validated MH instruments/structured assessments present. Step 2 multi-domain data present (clinical, social, cognitive, biological). Step 3 no explicit SCID/MINI/SCAN evidence -> characterisation_depth=3.	Response for Characterisation depth (axis)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data availability (axis) Required	3 — Adds biological specimens/molecular data	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Information about the Study “Biosample and phenotypic data collected includes: Prospective questionnaire, clinical and social measures, and blood or saliva sample collection.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about hasResearch=TRUE (questionnaire/cognitive/physical/linked records). hasBiological=TRUE (biosamples/genomic/omics). hasAdvanced=FALSE (no imaging/wearables/digital phenotyping evidence). Formula -> data_availability=3.	Response for Data availability (axis)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Cohort map group (derived) Recommended	Group 2	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—
Population type Recommended	Clinical	Not published	DIGIT Cohort Portfolio Review — population type and engagement classification (Aug 2026) Classified clinical in the DIGIT cohort portfolio review (Aug 2026). Participants enter via early intervention in psychosis services following first-episode psychosis; registry built for targeted recall.	Response for Population typeAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Industry engagement status Recommended	Unknown	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: industry engagement status is an organisational property of the custodian and is not publicly documented; default 'unknown' pending a cohort-owner meeting.	Response for Industry engagement statusAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Parent cohort / programme Recommended	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Parent cohort / programmeAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
TWiCs eligible Recommended	No	Not published	Set FALSE by rule: TWiCs eligibility requires consent_level=4 plus randomisation-ready infrastructure. Current consent evidence supports level 3 only.	Response for TWiCs eligibleAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Data modalities

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Questionnaire / interview Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — For Participants https://eim.digitrial.com/participants Section: General information “this study will collect information about you from clinical (medical) records, from blood and other samples, and from questionnaires.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/participants	Response for Questionnaire / interviewAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Cognitive testing Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Clinical outcome measures “medical and psychological including cognitive assessments” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about	Response for Cognitive testingAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Physical measures Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — For Participants https://eim.digitrial.com/participants Section: General information “collect information about you from clinical (medical) records, from blood and other samples” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/participants	Response for Physical measuresAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Biosamples Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Information about the Study “blood or saliva sample collection.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about	Response for BiosamplesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Genomic data Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Things to know “learn more about the genetic sequence (genomic)” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about	Response for Genomic dataAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Omics Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Things to know “the chemical makeup (metabolomic, e.g. how many fat molecules), the protein makeup (proteomic)” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about	Response for OmicsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Imaging Recommended	No	Not published	FALSE after exhaustive search of mandatory sources (EIM home/about/researchers/participants, MH-TRC early psychosis page, HDRUK entry, trial registry checks): no explicit statement that this cohort archives participant imaging data.	Response for ImagingAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Wearable / sensor Recommended	No	Not published	FALSE after exhaustive search of mandatory sources: no evidence of wearable or actigraphy data collection in this cohort.	Response for Wearable / sensorAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Digital phenotyping Recommended	No	Not published	FALSE after exhaustive search of mandatory sources: mobile symptom reporting is described, but no passive sensing or smartphone metadata collection is specified.	Response for Digital phenotypingAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Linked health records Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Study design “Prospective + retrospective routinely collected NHS data and external national linked data.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about	Response for Linked health recordsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Biosample types Recommended	blood, saliva	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Information about the Study “blood or saliva sample collection” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about Mapped to biosample_types={blood,saliva}.	Response for Biosample typesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Genotyping platform Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: genomics is stated, but specific platform is not publicly specified.	Response for Genotyping platformAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Imaging modalities Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE/FALSE context: no cohort imaging modalities explicitly published.	Response for Imaging modalitiesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Mental health measures Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no named validated instrument list publicly provided.	Response for Mental health measuresAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Data subcategories

Structured modality and subcategory rows used alongside the high-level data-type flags.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Data subcategories Recommended List key data subcategories using distinct rows for category markers, named questionnaire/interview instruments, biospecimen types, omics/genomics data products, imaging modalities, sensor streams, and linked-record types.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Data subcategoriesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Data subcategories

Recommended

List key data subcategories using distinct rows for category markers, named questionnaire/interview instruments, biospecimen types, omics/genomics data products, imaging modalities, sensor streams, and linked-record types.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Consent and use permissions

Specific use permissions separate from the 3D consent-level axis.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Consent and use permissions Recommended Confirm health/biomedical research use, industry/commercial consideration, non-commercial restrictions, governance modifiers, recontact, trial approach, biosample use, linkage, sharing, international transfer, and any Section 251/CAG support.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Consent and use permissionsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Consent and use permissions

Recommended

Confirm health/biomedical research use, industry/commercial consideration, non-commercial restrictions, governance modifiers, recontact, trial approach, biosample use, linkage, sharing, international transfer, and any Section 251/CAG support.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Access pathways

One or more routes by which researchers can request or analyse data.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Access pathways Recommended Confirm all data access pathways, including route, access level, TRE/SDE or download/API environment, DAC review, collaboration requirements, data sharing agreements, output checking, timelines, and fees.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Access pathwaysAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Access pathways

Recommended

Confirm all data access pathways, including route, access level, TRE/SDE or download/API environment, DAC review, collaboration requirements, data sharing agreements, output checking, timelines, and fees.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Within-cohort coverage

Aggregate counts or percentages showing how broadly data, consent, or access characteristics apply within the cohort.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Within-cohort coverage metrics Recommended Provide numerator, denominator, unit type, numerator/denominator exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, date/release, original source wording, and whether each metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Within-cohort coverage metricsAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Within-cohort coverage metrics

Recommended

Provide numerator, denominator, unit type, numerator/denominator exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, date/release, original source wording, and whether each metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.

No value held

No source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Linkage and access

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
NHS linkage Recommended	Yes	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Study design “routinely collected NHS data and external national linked data” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about	Response for NHS linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
GP linkage Recommended	No	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: mandatory sources searched but no explicit GP linkage statement found for this cohort.	Response for GP linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Death registry linkage Recommended	No	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: mandatory sources searched but no explicit death registry linkage statement found for this cohort.	Response for Death registry linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Education linkage Recommended	No	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: mandatory sources searched but no explicit education linkage statement found for this cohort.	Response for Education linkageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data access mechanism Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no cohort-specific public data access mechanism is published. Searched EIM home/about/researchers/participants pages, HDRUK dataset page, and registry pages.	Response for Data access mechanismAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
TRE platform Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no specific TRE platform publicly declared.	Response for TRE platformAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data dictionary URL Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no public data dictionary URL identified.	Response for Data dictionary URLAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data access timeline (days) Recommended	No value held	Field-cited	HDRUK Gateway — National Audit of Psychosis EIP dataset https://healthdatagateway.org/en/dataset/545 Section: Data Access Request “Dataset pipeline status Not available” Page: https://healthdatagateway.org/en/dataset/545 No fixed numeric access timeline published; leave NULL.	Response for Data access timeline (days)AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Data access cost Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no public access cost published for external applicants.	Response for Data access costAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Participant profile and dates

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Age distribution Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: sources report age range 16-65 but no proportion breakdown by age bands.	Response for Age distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Sex distribution Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no published sex split for the cohort target population on public pages.	Response for Sex distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Ethnicity distribution Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no public ethnicity distribution found after mandatory source search.	Response for Ethnicity distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Smoking status distribution Recommended	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Smoking status distributionAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Median age Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: only age range (16-65) is public; no median age disclosed.	Response for Median ageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Percent female Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no public sex percentage breakdown available.	Response for Percent femaleAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Percent non-white Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no public ethnicity percentage breakdown available.	Response for Percent non-whiteAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Geographic coverage Recommended	national	Field-cited	NIHR Oxford Health BRC — Early Psychosis workstream https://oxfordhealthbrc.nihr.ac.uk/mh-trc/early-psychosis/ Section: Regional context “The workstream is led by a multidisciplinary team spanning several UK regions, including Birmingham, Bristol, Cambridge, Cardiff, Liverpool, London and Manchester.” Page: https://oxfordhealthbrc.nihr.ac.uk/mh-trc/early-psychosis/ UK-wide multi-region recruitment supports national coverage.	Response for Geographic coverageAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Follow-up duration Recommended	0-3 years	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — About https://eim.digitrial.com/about Section: Duration “We plan to collect data for up to 3 years” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/about Mapped to followup_duration=0-3 years.	Response for Follow-up durationAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Last data collection date Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no public date for latest completed data collection wave.	Response for Last data collection dateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Recruitment start date Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: no explicit recruitment start date published on public pages.	Response for Recruitment start dateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes
Recruitment end date Recommended	No value held	Not published	Searched — not published UNSOURCEABLE: study is ongoing and no end-of-recruitment date published.	Response for Recruitment end dateAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Diagnosis areas

Mental health diagnosis areas represented in this cohort.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Diagnosis area: First-episode psychosis Recommended Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.	First-episode psychosis · Psychotic Disorders · est. n=2,000	Field-cited	Early Intervention Mission Study — For Researchers https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers Section: Background “2,000 individuals with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) or At-Risk Mental State (ARMS), alongside 500 control participants.” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers Estimated_n=2000 set as approximate case cohort size; note that this includes FEP and ARMS participants. Early Intervention Mission Study — For Researchers https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers Section: Background “2,000 individuals with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) or At-Risk Mental State (ARMS)” Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers Confirms cohort includes first-episode psychosis population.	Response for Diagnosis area: First-episode psychosisAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Field

Current value

Evidence

Source evidence

Response

Notes / correction

Diagnosis area: First-episode psychosis

Recommended

Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.

First-episode psychosis · Psychotic Disorders · est. n=2,000

Field-cited

Early Intervention Mission Study — For Researchers
https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers
Section: Background
“2,000 individuals with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) or At-Risk Mental State (ARMS), alongside 500 control participants.”
Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers
Estimated_n=2000 set as approximate case cohort size; note that this includes FEP and ARMS participants.
Early Intervention Mission Study — For Researchers
https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers
Section: Background
“2,000 individuals with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) or At-Risk Mental State (ARMS)”
Page: https://eim.digitrial.com/researchers
Confirms cohort includes first-episode psychosis population.

AccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply

Linked sites

Sites contributing participants or data to this cohort.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Linked sites Optional	No value held	No source yet	No citation linked to this field yet.	Response for Linked sitesAccurateNeeds correctionNot sureDoes not apply No response selected	No notes

Verification metadata

Internal catalogue status — for reference only.

Field	Current value	Evidence	Source evidence	Response	Notes / correction
Verification status Recommended	unverified	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—
Last verified Recommended	No value held	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—
Data source Recommended	No value held	Internal	Internal catalogue field	—	—