Seed data — not verified. Approximate data from public sources, not yet confirmed by cohort leads or site reps.

Why?
All validation packs

Cohort validation pack

Generation Scotland

Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study

Generated 6 Oct 2026, 10:37 · ID 12

Unverified

Instructions for reviewers

  • Review each field against your knowledge of this cohort. Mark Accurate if the value is right, Needs correction if it is wrong or inaccurate (add notes), Not sure if you cannot verify it, or Does not apply if the field is not relevant.
  • Evidence shown is from our source registry. Fields marked No source yet hold values we could not yet pin to a document — those were AI-inferred and need your input most. Fields marked Searched — not published are ones we looked for and could not find publicly; the note lists where we checked.
  • Your selections and notes are kept in this browser tab only (not sent to the database). Print or save as PDF when finished, then return it to the DIGIT team.

Overview

108

Total fields

89

Field-cited

0

Whole-record source only

2

AI-inferred, no source yet

12

Searched — not published

14

No value held

14

Needs review

Source coverage

Summary of how well fields in this pack are linked to evidence.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Field-level source coverage

Optional

89 of 103 reviewable fields are cited to a source (86%) · 2 with no source yet · 12 searched — not published · 14 with no value heldComputed

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Field-level source coverage

Identity and ownership

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Short name

Required

Generation ScotlandField-cited
Response for Short name
Full name

Required

Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health StudyField-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Abstract

    “GS:SFHS is a family-based genetic epidemiology study”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

Response for Full name
Managing organisation

Recommended

University of EdinburghField-cited
Response for Managing organisation
Primary site

Recommended

University of Edinburgh (site #12)Field-cited
  • Generation Scotland — For Researchers

    https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers

    Section: For Researchers

    “We are based at The University of Edinburgh”

    Page: https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers

Response for Primary site
Website URL

Recommended

https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/Field-cited
Response for Website URL
Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URL

Recommended

https://www.cataloguementalhealth.ac.uk/GSSFHSField-cited
  • Catalogue of Mental Health Measures

    https://www.cataloguementalhealth.ac.uk

    Section: Official sitemap study URL

    “https://www.cataloguementalhealth.ac.uk/GSSFHS”

    Page: https://www.cataloguementalhealth.ac.uk/GSSFHS

Response for Catalogue of Mental Health Measures URL
Contact name

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: public GS pages provide functional contact routes rather than a single named cohort contact for this field.

Response for Contact name
Contact email

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE for stable cohort-level field: both GenScot@ed.ac.uk and gen.scot@ed.ac.uk appear across pages; left NULL pending owner confirmation of canonical contact mailbox.

Response for Contact email

Summary and status

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Description

Required

Family-based longitudinal cohort across Scotland combining questionnaire, cognitive, physical and multi-omics data with NHS record linkage and recontact for follow-on studies.Field-cited
  • Generation Scotland — For Researchers

    https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers

    Section: For Researchers

    “Generation Scotland combines questionnaire data on health and wellbeing across the life course with NHS health record linkage and biological measures”

    Page: https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers

Response for Description
Total N

Required

41,211Field-cited
Response for Total N
Total N qualifier

Recommended

approximateField-cited
  • Generation Scotland — For Researchers

    https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers

    Section: For Researchers

    “with over 40,000 participants in total”

    Page: https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers

Response for Total N qualifier
Year established

Recommended

2006Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Abstract

    “from February 2006 to March 2011”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

Response for Year established
Active cohort

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Future plans

    “Next Generation Scotland launched in May 2022 to expand the existing cohort”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Active cohort
Ongoing recruitment

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Future plans

    “Next Generation Scotland launched in May 2022 to expand the existing cohort by a target of 20 000 additional volunteers”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Ongoing recruitment
Refreshed cohort

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Future plans

    “To create a larger, richer, longitudinal resource, Next Generation Scotland launched in May 2022 to expand the existing cohort”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Refreshed cohort

Recontact success rate

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: no public percentage for successful recontact in searched sources (IJE 2013, BMJ 2024, GS website, DPUK pages).

Response for Recontact success rate

Retention rate

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: no cohort-wide retention percentage published in searched sources.

Response for Retention rate

Published references

Recommended

doi:10.1093/ije/dys084, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Article header

    “DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Article metadata

    “DOI: 10.1093/ije/dys084”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

Response for Published references
Notes

Recommended

Includes original GS:SFHS recruitment plus NextGenScot expansion with continued linkage and recontact studies.Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Data access and collaborations

    “GS also collaborates with ... DPUK ... CLOSER ... HDR UK Innovation Gateway.”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

  • ClinicalTrials.gov Search: Generation Scotland

    https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=%22Generation%20Scotland%22

    Section: Search page capture

    “ClinicalTrials.gov ... Search for terms”

    Page: https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=%22Generation%20Scotland%22

  • ISRCTN Search: Generation Scotland

    https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=%22Generation%20Scotland%22

    Section: Registry search notes

    “ISRCTN ... search endpoint returned HTTP 500 at verification time”

    Page: https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=%22Generation%20Scotland%22

Response for Notes

3D cohort mapping

Consent, characterisation, and data availability axes used on the cohort map.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Consent level (axis)

Required

3 — Broad consent (recontactable for future studies)Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Abstract

    “broad consent from participants to use their data and samples for a wide range of medical research, including commercial research, and for re-contact”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

Response for Consent level (axis)
Characterisation depth (axis)

Required

3 — Multi-domain MH characterisationField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Baseline data collection

    “Standardised assessments included the 28-item General Health Questionnaire, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders, Mood Disorder Questionnaire”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Characterisation depth (axis)
Data availability (axis)

Required

4 — Multi-modalField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “Genotype array data are available for 20 026 (83%) participants ... blood-based DNA methylation data for 18 869 (78%) participants ... Multimodal brain imaging is available in 1069 individuals.”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Data availability (axis)
Cohort map group (derived)

Recommended

Group 1Internal

Internal catalogue field

——
Population type

Recommended

General populationNot published
  • DIGIT Cohort Portfolio Review — population type and engagement classification (Aug 2026)

Response for Population type
Industry engagement status

Recommended

UnknownNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: industry engagement status is an organisational property of the custodian and is not publicly documented; default 'unknown' pending a cohort-owner meeting.

Response for Industry engagement status
Parent cohort / programme

Recommended

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Parent cohort / programme
TWiCs eligible

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Abstract

    “broad consent ... for re-contact”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

Response for TWiCs eligible

Data modalities

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Questionnaire / interview

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Abstract

    “DNA and socio-demographic and clinical data ... detailed data on ... mental health”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

Response for Questionnaire / interview
Cognitive testing

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “detailed baseline data were collected on ... cognitive function”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Cognitive testing
Physical measures

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Baseline data collection

    “physical measurements included height, weight, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, ECG and body composition analysis”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Physical measures
Biosamples

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Abstract

    “Biological samples and anonymized data form a resource”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

Response for Biosamples
Genomic data

Recommended

YesField-cited
Response for Genomic data
Omics

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Generation Scotland — For Researchers

    https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers

    Section: About Omics Data

    “DNA methylation for 79% of participants, and proteomic data for 82% of participants”

    Page: https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers

Response for Omics
Imaging

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “Multimodal brain imaging is available in 1069 individuals.”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Imaging
Wearable / sensor

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Generation Scotland Data Explorer Dashboard

    https://shiny.igc.ed.ac.uk/GS_Data_Explorer/

    Section: Cohort Summary

    “Total Volunteers 41,211 ... Genotype Data ... Methylation ... Proteomics”

    Page: https://shiny.igc.ed.ac.uk/GS_Data_Explorer/

Response for Wearable / sensor
Digital phenotyping

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Generation Scotland Data Explorer Dashboard

    https://shiny.igc.ed.ac.uk/GS_Data_Explorer/

    Section: For Researchers

    “Generation Scotland combines questionnaire data ... with NHS health record linkage and biological measures”

    Page: https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers

Response for Digital phenotyping
Linked health records

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “Linkage to routine National Health Service datasets has been possible for 93% (n=22 402) of the cohort”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Linked health records
Biosample types

Recommended

blood, saliva, urineField-cited
Response for Biosample types
Genotyping platform

Recommended

Illumina HumanOmniExpressExomeField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Genomics

    “Samples were genotyped using the Illumina HumanOmniExpressExome”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Genotyping platform
Imaging modalities

Recommended

structural_mri, fmri, dwiField-cited
Response for Imaging modalities
Mental health measures

Recommended

GHQ-28, SCID, Mood Disorder QuestionnaireField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Baseline data collection

    “General Health Questionnaire ... Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders ... Mood Disorder Questionnaire”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Mental health measures

Data subcategories

Structured modality and subcategory rows used alongside the high-level data-type flags.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Data modality: Blood sample

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · biosamples · biospecimen type · parent: Biospecimen collection · Blood sample resourceField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Blood sample resource”
Response for Data modality: Blood sample

Data modality: Saliva sample

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · biosamples · biospecimen type · parent: Biospecimen collection · Saliva sample resourceField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Saliva sample resource”
Response for Data modality: Saliva sample

Data modality: Urine sample

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · biosamples · biospecimen type · parent: Biospecimen collection · Urine sample resourceField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Urine sample resource”
Response for Data modality: Urine sample

Data modality: Biospecimen collection

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · biosamples · category marker · Blood, saliva, urine and DNA-related sample resourcesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Blood, saliva, urine and DNA-related sample resources”
Response for Data modality: Biospecimen collection

Data modality: Cognitive assessment data

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · cognitive measures · category marker · Cognitive function dataField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Cognitive function data”
Response for Data modality: Cognitive assessment data

Data modality: Genotyping array

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · genomics · derived genomic data · Illumina HumanOmniExpressExome genotypingField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Illumina HumanOmniExpressExome genotyping”
Response for Data modality: Genotyping array

Data modality: Brain MRI

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · imaging · category marker · Multimodal brain imaging subsetField-cited
Response for Data modality: Brain MRI

Data modality: Diffusion MRI

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · imaging · imaging modality · parent: Brain MRI · Diffusion MRIField-cited
Response for Data modality: Diffusion MRI

Data modality: Functional MRI

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · imaging · imaging modality · parent: Brain MRI · Resting-state fMRIField-cited
Response for Data modality: Functional MRI

Data modality: Structural MRI

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · imaging · imaging modality · parent: Brain MRI · T1-weighted MRIField-cited
Response for Data modality: Structural MRI

Data modality: Linked NHS records

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · linked health records · category marker · Routine NHS dataset linkageField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Routine NHS dataset linkage”
Response for Data modality: Linked NHS records

Data modality: Linked GP records

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · linked health records · linked record type · parent: Linked NHS records · General practice linked dataField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “General practice linked data”
Response for Data modality: Linked GP records

Data modality: Linked death registry

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · linked health records · linked record type · parent: Linked NHS records · NRS deaths dataField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “NRS deaths data”
Response for Data modality: Linked death registry

Data modality: DNA methylation

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · omics · derived omics data · Blood-based DNA methylation dataField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Blood-based DNA methylation data”
Response for Data modality: DNA methylation

Data modality: Proteomics

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · omics · derived omics data · Proteomics dataField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Proteomics data”
Response for Data modality: Proteomics

Data modality: Clinical / physical measurements

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · physical measures · category marker · Height, weight, heart rate, blood pressure, ECG and body compositionField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Height, weight, heart rate, blood pressure, ECG and body composition”
Response for Data modality: Clinical / physical measurements

Data modality: Anthropometry

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · physical measures · clinical physical measure · parent: Clinical / physical measurements · Height and weightField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Height and weight”
Response for Data modality: Anthropometry

Data modality: Blood pressure / vitals

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · physical measures · clinical physical measure · parent: Clinical / physical measurements · Systolic and diastolic blood pressureField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Systolic and diastolic blood pressure”
Response for Data modality: Blood pressure / vitals

Data modality: Body composition

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · physical measures · clinical physical measure · parent: Clinical / physical measurements · Body composition analysisField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Body composition analysis”
Response for Data modality: Body composition

Data modality: Questionnaire / interview data

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · questionnaires · category marker · Health and wellbeing questionnaire data across the life courseField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Health and wellbeing questionnaire data across the life course”
Response for Data modality: Questionnaire / interview data

Data modality: GHQ-12 / GHQ

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · questionnaires · questionnaire instrument · parent: Questionnaire / interview data · General Health Questionnaire family instruments · Existing seed stores GHQ-28; grouped under GHQ modality.Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “General Health Questionnaire family instruments”
Response for Data modality: GHQ-12 / GHQ

Data modality: Mood Disorder Questionnaire

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · questionnaires · questionnaire instrument · parent: Questionnaire / interview data · Mood Disorder QuestionnaireField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Mood Disorder Questionnaire”
Response for Data modality: Mood Disorder Questionnaire

Data modality: SCID

Recommended

Confirm this row is correctly typed as a category marker, named instrument/interview, biospecimen type, assay/data product, imaging modality, sensor stream, or linked-record type; add missing named instruments/sample types where known.

available · questionnaires · structured interview · parent: Questionnaire / interview data · Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DisordersField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Pilot modality classification

    “Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders”
Response for Data modality: SCID

Consent and use permissions

Specific use permissions separate from the 3D consent-level axis.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Consent/use: Biosample research use

Recommended

Confirm status, population scope, whether the permission is a DUO-style restriction/permission or a local operational permission, and whether academic and industry/commercial use differ.

permitted · biosample use · local operational permission · Participants with samples · Broad consent includes use of data and samples.Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Pilot consent/use permission classification

    “Broad consent includes use of data and samples.”
Response for Consent/use: Biosample research use

Consent/use: Industry / commercial research considered

Recommended

Confirm status, population scope, whether the permission is a DUO-style restriction/permission or a local operational permission, and whether academic and industry/commercial use differ.

permitted · commercial use · local operational permission · Consented participants · Cohort profile states consent includes commercial research.Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Pilot consent/use permission classification

    “Cohort profile states consent includes commercial research.”
Response for Consent/use: Industry / commercial research considered

Consent/use: Health record linkage permitted

Recommended

Confirm status, population scope, whether the permission is a DUO-style restriction/permission or a local operational permission, and whether academic and industry/commercial use differ.

permitted · data linkage · local operational permission · Consented participants · NHS linkage possible for a large participant subset.Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Pilot consent/use permission classification

    “NHS linkage possible for a large participant subset.”
Response for Consent/use: Health record linkage permitted

Consent/use: Data sharing permitted

Recommended

Confirm status, population scope, whether the permission is a DUO-style restriction/permission or a local operational permission, and whether academic and industry/commercial use differ.

restricted · data sharing · local operational permission · Approved researchers · Data sharing requires access committee approval.Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Pilot consent/use permission classification

    “Data sharing requires access committee approval.”
Response for Consent/use: Data sharing permitted

Consent/use: Ethics approval required

Recommended

Confirm status, population scope, whether the permission is a DUO-style restriction/permission or a local operational permission, and whether academic and industry/commercial use differ.

restricted · governance · duo modifier · Commercial and academic users · Access remains subject to Generation Scotland Access Committee review.Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Pilot consent/use permission classification

    “Access remains subject to Generation Scotland Access Committee review.”
Response for Consent/use: Ethics approval required

Consent/use: Participant recontact permitted

Recommended

Confirm status, population scope, whether the permission is a DUO-style restriction/permission or a local operational permission, and whether academic and industry/commercial use differ.

permitted · recontact · local operational permission · Consented participants · Broad consent includes recontact.Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Pilot consent/use permission classification

    “Broad consent includes recontact.”
Response for Consent/use: Participant recontact permitted

Consent/use: Health / medical / biomedical research use

Recommended

Confirm status, population scope, whether the permission is a DUO-style restriction/permission or a local operational permission, and whether academic and industry/commercial use differ.

permitted · research use · duo permission · DUO:0000002 · Consented participants · Broad consent covers wide medical research uses.Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Pilot consent/use permission classification

    “Broad consent covers wide medical research uses.”
Response for Consent/use: Health / medical / biomedical research use

Consent/use: Approach for trials permitted

Recommended

Confirm status, population scope, whether the permission is a DUO-style restriction/permission or a local operational permission, and whether academic and industry/commercial use differ.

restricted · trial approach · local operational permission · Consented participants · Recontact is permitted; trial participation would require study-specific consent.Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Pilot consent/use permission classification

    “Recontact is permitted; trial participation would require study-specific consent.”
Response for Consent/use: Approach for trials permitted

Access pathways

One or more routes by which researchers can request or analyse data.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Access pathway: Direct application

Recommended

Confirm route, access level, environment type, DAC review, collaboration, data sharing agreement, output checking, platform, timeline, cost, URL, and whether multiple routes are possible.

available on application · access level: controlled · environment: secure download · DAC review required · data sharing agreement required · Generation Scotland Access Request · Charges may apply · https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers/access · Applications are reviewed by the Generation Scotland Access Committee.Field-cited
  • Generation Scotland — Make an Access Request

    https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers/access

    Section: Pilot data access pathway classification

    “Applications are reviewed by the Generation Scotland Access Committee.”
Response for Access pathway: Direct application

Access pathway: Managed access / DAC

Recommended

Confirm route, access level, environment type, DAC review, collaboration, data sharing agreement, output checking, platform, timeline, cost, URL, and whether multiple routes are possible.

available on application · access level: controlled · environment: secure download · DAC review required · data sharing agreement required · Generation Scotland Access Committee · Charges may apply · https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers/access · Access committee review is required before data release.Field-cited
  • Generation Scotland — Make an Access Request

    https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers/access

    Section: Pilot data access pathway classification

    “Access committee review is required before data release.”
Response for Access pathway: Managed access / DAC

Within-cohort coverage

Aggregate counts or percentages showing how broadly data, consent, or access characteristics apply within the cohort.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction

Coverage: DNA methylation data

Recommended

Confirm numerator, denominator, unit type, exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, as-of date/release, source wording, and whether the metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.

18,869 · unit: participants · denominator: unknown · basis: available to researchers · status: available · scope: marginal · source value: 18,869 participants and 78% · Source reports 18,869 participants and 78%; denominator should be confirmed by cohort owner.Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “blood-based DNA methylation data for 18 869 (78%) participants”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Coverage: DNA methylation data

Coverage: Genotype array data

Recommended

Confirm numerator, denominator, unit type, exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, as-of date/release, source wording, and whether the metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.

20,026 · unit: participants · denominator: unknown · basis: available to researchers · status: available · scope: marginal · source value: 20,026 participants and 83% · Source reports 20,026 participants and 83%; denominator should be confirmed by cohort owner.Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “Genotype array data are available for 20 026 (83%) participants”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Coverage: Genotype array data

Coverage: Multimodal brain imaging

Recommended

Confirm numerator, denominator, unit type, exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, as-of date/release, source wording, and whether the metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.

1,069 · unit: participants · denominator: unknown · basis: available to researchers · status: available · scope: marginal · source value: 1,069 participants · Marginal imaging subset count.Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “Multimodal brain imaging is available in 1069 individuals.”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Coverage: Multimodal brain imaging

Coverage: Routine NHS linkage possible

Recommended

Confirm numerator, denominator, unit type, exactness qualifiers, denominator type, basis, as-of date/release, source wording, and whether the metric is marginal, joint, conditional, or a release total.

22,402 · unit: participants · denominator: unknown · basis: linked · status: available · scope: marginal · source value: 22,402 participants and 93% · Source reports linkage possible for 22,402 participants and 93%; denominator should be confirmed by cohort owner.Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “Linkage to routine National Health Service datasets has been possible for 93% (n=22 402) of the cohort”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Coverage: Routine NHS linkage possible

Linkage and access

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
NHS linkage

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “Linkage to routine National Health Service datasets has been possible for 93%”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for NHS linkage
GP linkage

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Table 2

    “Summary of linked data sources ... General practice (GP)”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for GP linkage
Death registry linkage

Recommended

YesField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Table 2

    “Summary of linked data sources ... Deaths (NRS deaths data)”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Death registry linkage
Education linkage

Recommended

NoField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Strengths and limitations

    “Planned additional linkages include ... education records”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Education linkage
Data access mechanism

Recommended

direct_applicationField-cited
  • Generation Scotland — Make an Access Request

    https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers/access

    Section: Approval Process

    “Upon submission, your application will be reviewed by the Generation Scotland Access Committee”

    Page: https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers/access

Response for Data access mechanism
TRE platform

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: no named TRE/SDE platform is stated on the accessed GS pages.

Response for TRE platform
Data dictionary URL

Recommended

https://generation-scotland.ed.ac.uk/for-researchers/accessField-cited
Response for Data dictionary URL
Data access timeline (days)

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE exact integer: access page states review within 6-8 weeks, but no single day value is published.

Response for Data access timeline (days)
Data access cost

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE: access page indicates charges may apply and invites contact, but no stable public fee schedule is listed.

Response for Data access cost

Participant profile and dates

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Age distribution

Recommended

mean_age_49: 1Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “average age at recruitment of 49 years”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Age distribution
Sex distribution

Recommended

male: 0.41; female: 0.59Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “59% are women”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Sex distribution
Ethnicity distribution

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE as structured JSON in current public extracts. BMJ table provides aggregate ethnicity percentages but not full multi-bin distribution aligned to schema JSON.

Response for Ethnicity distribution
Smoking status distribution

Recommended

No value heldNo source yet

No citation linked to this field yet.

Response for Smoking status distribution
Median age

Recommended

49.0Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Abstract - Participants

    “average age at recruitment of 49 years”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Median age
Percent female

Recommended

59.00Field-cited
Response for Percent female
Percent non-white

Recommended

1.10Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Table 1

    “Ethnicity ... White 94.8% ... Other 1.1%”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Percent non-white
Geographic coverage

Recommended

nationalField-cited
Response for Geographic coverage
Follow-up duration

Recommended

19+ years (2006-present)Field-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Longitudinal data linkage

    “participants have up to 16-year follow-up data since recruitment in 2006”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Follow-up duration
Last data collection date

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE exact date: public sources report phases and ongoing/target windows, not a canonical last collection date field.

Response for Last data collection date
Recruitment start date

Recommended

1 Feb 2006Field-cited
  • Smith et al. 2013 — Generation Scotland Cohort Profile (IJE)

    https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

    Section: Abstract

    “from February 2006 to March 2011”

    Page: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys084

Response for Recruitment start date
Recruitment end date

Recommended

No value heldNot published
  • Searched — not published

    UNSOURCEABLE exact date for combined GS + NextGenScot resource; public pages present phase windows but not a single definitive end date used by schema field.

Response for Recruitment end date

Diagnosis areas

Mental health diagnosis areas represented in this cohort.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Diagnosis area: Major depressive disorder

Recommended

Confirm this diagnosis area applies and estimated N if shown.

Major depressive disorder · Mood Disorders · est. n=2,346Field-cited
Response for Diagnosis area: Major depressive disorder

Linked sites

Sites contributing participants or data to this cohort.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Linked site: University of Edinburgh

Recommended

University of Edinburgh · ScotlandField-cited
Response for Linked site: University of Edinburgh
Linked site: University of Glasgow / NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Recommended

University of Glasgow / NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · ScotlandField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Introduction

    “GS was founded as a multi-institutional, cross-disciplinary collaboration between the Universities of Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh and Glasgow”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Linked site: University of Glasgow / NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Linked site: University of Aberdeen / NHS Grampian

Recommended

University of Aberdeen / NHS Grampian · ScotlandField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Introduction

    “GS was founded as a multi-institutional, cross-disciplinary collaboration between the Universities of Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh and Glasgow”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Linked site: University of Aberdeen / NHS Grampian
Linked site: University of Dundee / NHS Tayside

Recommended

University of Dundee / NHS Tayside · ScotlandField-cited
  • Milbourn et al. 2024 — Generation Scotland Update (BMJ Open)

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084719

    Section: Introduction

    “GS was founded as a multi-institutional, cross-disciplinary collaboration between the Universities of Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh and Glasgow”

    Page: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340249/

Response for Linked site: University of Dundee / NHS Tayside

Verification metadata

Internal catalogue status — for reference only.

FieldCurrent valueEvidenceSource evidenceResponseNotes / correction
Verification status

Recommended

unverifiedInternal

Internal catalogue field

——
Last verified

Recommended

No value heldInternal

Internal catalogue field

——
Data source

Recommended

No value heldInternal

Internal catalogue field

——